111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15691727)
1. Nonradiologists as second readers for intraluminal findings at CT colonography.
Bodily KD; Fletcher JG; Engelby T; Percival M; Christensen JA; Young B; Krych AJ; Vander Kooi DC; Rodysill D; Fidler JL; Johnson CD
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 15691727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding interpretive errors in radiologists learning computed tomography colonography.
Fidler JL; Fletcher JG; Johnson CD; Huprich JE; Barlow JM; Earnest F; Bartholmai BJ
Acad Radiol; 2004 Jul; 11(7):750-6. PubMed ID: 15217592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gastroenterologists' interpretation of CTC: a pilot study demonstrating feasibility and similar accuracy compared with radiologists' interpretation.
Young PE; Ray QP; Hwang I; Kikendall JW; Gentry AB; Skopic A; Cash BD
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Dec; 104(12):2926-31. PubMed ID: 19672252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT colonography: multicenter study.
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology CT Colonography Group Investigators
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):152-61. PubMed ID: 17185666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT colonography: role of a second reader CAD paradigm in the initial training of radiologists.
Neri E; Faggioni L; Regge D; Vagli P; Turini F; Cerri F; Picano E; Giusti S; Bartolozzi C
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):303-9. PubMed ID: 20832219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can radiologist training and testing ensure high performance in CT colonography? Lessons From the National CT Colonography Trial.
Fletcher JG; Chen MH; Herman BA; Johnson CD; Toledano A; Dachman AH; Hara AK; Fidler JL; Menias CO; Coakley KJ; Kuo M; Horton KM; Cheema J; Iyer R; Siewert B; Yee J; Obregon R; Zimmerman P; Halvorsen R; Casola G; Morrin M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 20566804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions.
Park SH; Ha HK; Kim MJ; Kim KW; Kim AY; Yang DH; Lee MG; Kim PN; Shin YM; Yang SK; Myung SJ; Min YI
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):495-502. PubMed ID: 15770042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a standardized CT colonography training program for novice readers.
Liedenbaum MH; Bipat S; Bossuyt PM; Dwarkasing RS; de Haan MC; Jansen RJ; Kauffman D; van der Leij C; de Lijster MS; Lute CC; van der Paardt MP; Thomeer MG; Zijlstra IA; Stoker J
Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):477-87. PubMed ID: 21177395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiographers are valuable contributors in interpreting computed tomography colonography.
Thomsen H; Egelund M; Strozik JE; Vuust M
Dan Med J; 2016 Feb; 63(2):. PubMed ID: 26836797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computed tomography colonography: feasibility of computer-aided polyp detection in a "first reader" paradigm.
Mani A; Napel S; Paik DS; Jeffrey RB; Yee J; Olcott EW; Prokesch R; Davila M; Schraedley-Desmond P; Beaulieu CF
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2004; 28(3):318-26. PubMed ID: 15100534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance.
McFarland EG; Pilgram TK; Brink JA; McDermott RA; Santillan CV; Brady PW; Heiken JP; Balfe DM; Weinstock LB; Thyssen EP; Littenberg B
Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):380-90. PubMed ID: 12409570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Missed lesions and false-positive findings on computed-tomographic colonography: a controlled prospective analysis.
Arnesen RB; Adamsen S; Svendsen LB; Raaschou HO; von Benzon E; Hansen OH
Endoscopy; 2005 Oct; 37(10):937-44. PubMed ID: 16189765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of CT colonography interpreted by radiologists and radiographers.
Lauridsen C; Lefere P; Gerke O; Hageman S; Karstoft J; Gryspeerdt S
Insights Imaging; 2013 Aug; 4(4):491-7. PubMed ID: 23765729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Editorial: CTC interpretation by gastroenterologists: feasible but largely impractical, undesirable, and misguided.
Pickhardt PJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Dec; 104(12):2932-4. PubMed ID: 19956116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection.
Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S; Taylor SA; Burling D; Roddie M; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
Gastroenterology; 2006 Dec; 131(6):1690-9. PubMed ID: 17087934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Burling D; Morley S; Bassett P; Atkin W; Bartram CI
Eur Radiol; 2004 Jun; 14(6):1025-33. PubMed ID: 14872280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography.
Summers RM; Jerebko AK; Franaszek M; Malley JD; Johnson CD
Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):391-9. PubMed ID: 12409571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method.
Gluecker TM; Fletcher JG; Welch TJ; MacCarty RL; Harmsen WS; Harrington JR; Ilstrup D; Wilson LA; Corcoran KE; Johnson CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 15039159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CAD techniques, challenges, and controversies in computed tomographic colonography.
Yoshida H; Dachman AH
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(1):26-41. PubMed ID: 15647868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Paris classification of colonic polyps using CT colonography: prospective cohort study of interobserver variation.
Gangi-Burton A; Plumb AA; De Paepe KN; Godfrey EM; Halligan S; Higginson A; Khwaja S; Patel A; Taylor S
Eur Radiol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38488970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
