These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15692128)

  • 1. Intracardiac voltage gradients during transthoracic defibrillation: implications for postshock myocardial injury.
    Niemann JT; Walker RG; Rosborough JP
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Feb; 12(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15692128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A percutaneous catheter-based system for the measurement of potential gradients applicable to the study of transthoracic defibrillation.
    Rosborough JP; Deno DC; Walker RG; Niemann JT
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 17338711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance.
    Zhang Y; Rhee B; Davies LR; Zimmerman MB; Snyder D; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2006 Feb; 68(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 16325983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pediatric defibrillation: current flow is improved by using "adult" electrode paddles.
    Atkins DL; Kerber RE
    Pediatrics; 1994 Jul; 94(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 8008545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the efficacy and safety of a novel monophasic waveform delivered by the passive implantable atrial defibrillator with biphasic waveforms in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
    Manoharan G; Evans N; Allen D; Anderson J; Adgey J
    Circulation; 2004 Apr; 109(13):1686-92. PubMed ID: 15051642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defibrillation probability and impedance change between shocks during resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Walker RG; Koster RW; Sun C; Moffat G; Barger J; Dodson PP; Chapman FW
    Resuscitation; 2009 Jul; 80(7):773-7. PubMed ID: 19423211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual effect of components of defibrillation waveform on the contractile function and intracellular calcium dynamics of cardiomyocytes.
    Tsai MS; Tang W; Sun S; Wang H; Freeman G; Chen WJ; Weil MH
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Aug; 37(8):2394-401. PubMed ID: 19531953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Novel rectangular biphasic and monophasic waveforms delivered by a radiofrequency-powered defibrillator compared with conventional capacitor-based waveforms in transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
    Walsh SJ; Manoharan G; Escalona OJ; Santos J; Evans N; Anderson JM; Stevenson M; Allen JD; Adgey AA
    Europace; 2006 Oct; 8(10):873-80. PubMed ID: 17000635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of five different defibrillators using recommended energy protocols.
    Zelinka M; Buić D; Zelinka I
    Resuscitation; 2007 Sep; 74(3):500-7. PubMed ID: 17466431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of efficacy of pulsed biphasic waveform and rectilinear biphasic waveform in a short ventricular fibrillation pig model.
    Li Y; Wang H; Cho JH; Didon JP; Bisera J; Weil MH; Tang W
    Resuscitation; 2009 Sep; 80(9):1047-51. PubMed ID: 19604618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical open-chest ventricular defibrillation: triphasic waveforms are superior to biphasic waveforms.
    Zhang Y; Boddicker KA; Davies LR; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 27(7):941-8. PubMed ID: 15271014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in transthoracic impedance during sequential biphasic defibrillation.
    Deakin CD; Ambler JJ; Shaw S
    Resuscitation; 2008 Aug; 78(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 18486297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current is better than energy as predictor of success for biphasic defibrillatory shocks in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation.
    Ristagno G; Yu T; Quan W; Freeman G; Li Y
    Resuscitation; 2013 May; 84(5):678-83. PubMed ID: 23032689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selecting the transthoracic defibrillation shock directional vector based on VF amplitude improves shock success.
    Brooks L; Zhang Y; Dendi R; Anderson RH; Zimmerman B; Kerber RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Sep; 20(9):1032-8. PubMed ID: 19460079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness and safety of internal rectilinear biphasic versus monophasic defibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
    Winterhalter M; Piepenbrock T; Leyh RG; Gras C; Zuk J; Heine J; Hagl C; Rahe-Meyer N; Hecker H; Piepenbrock S
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2005 Dec; 19(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 16326298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of biphasic waveform design on post-resuscitation myocardial function.
    Tang W; Weil MH; Sun S; Jorgenson D; Morgan C; Klouche K; Snyder D
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Apr; 43(7):1228-35. PubMed ID: 15063435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rectilinear biphasic to monophasic damped sine defibrillation waveforms with advanced life support intervention trial (ORBIT).
    Morrison LJ; Dorian P; Long J; Vermeulen M; Schwartz B; Sawadsky B; Frank J; Cameron B; Burgess R; Shield J; Bagley P; Mausz V; Brewer JE; Lerman BB;
    Resuscitation; 2005 Aug; 66(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 15992986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transthoracic impedance study with large self-adhesive electrodes in two conventional positions for defibrillation.
    Krasteva V; Matveev M; Mudrov N; Prokopova R
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Oct; 27(10):1009-22. PubMed ID: 16951460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoperative comparison of a subthreshold test pulse with the standard high-energy shock approach for the measurement of defibrillation lead impedance.
    Schuchert A; Winter J; Binner L; Kühl M; Meinertz T;
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jan; 17(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 16426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post-shock myocardial stunning: a prospective randomised double-blind comparison of monophasic and biphasic waveforms.
    Deakin CD; Ambler JJ
    Resuscitation; 2006 Mar; 68(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 16378672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.