These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15692420)

  • 1. [Carcinoma with false negative mammogram: when and how?].
    Roger P; Delfour C; Ragu N; Serre I; Baldet P; Taourel P
    J Radiol; 2004 Dec; 85(12 Pt 2):2063-7. PubMed ID: 15692420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The false-negative mammogram.
    Huynh PT; Jarolimek AM; Daye S
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(5):1137-54; quiz 1243-4. PubMed ID: 9747612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Delayed diagnosis and large size of breast cancer after a false negative mammogram.
    Joensuu H; Asola R; Holli K; Kumpulainen E; Nikkanen V; Parvinen LM
    Eur J Cancer; 1994; 30A(9):1299-302. PubMed ID: 7999417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancers invisible on mammography.
    Foxcroft LM; Evans EB; Joshua HK; Hirst C
    Aust N Z J Surg; 2000 Mar; 70(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 10765896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors.
    Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Wray LA; Helvie MA
    Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 14695385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limitations of mammography in the identification of noninfiltrating carcinoma of the breast.
    Sener SF; Candela FC; Paige ML; Bernstein JR; Winchester DP
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 2840746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
    Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammography in hospital patients: use and misuse.
    Woods WG; Earlam RJ; Turner MJ
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1992 Feb; 37(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 1573600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammography of women with suspicious breast lumps.
    Young JO; Sadowsky NL; Young JW; Herman L
    Arch Surg; 1986 Jul; 121(7):807-9. PubMed ID: 3718215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic findings and extent of disease at diagnosis in 184 patients.
    Krecke KN; Gisvold JJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):957-60. PubMed ID: 8273634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False-negative mammograms in patients with breast cancer.
    Niloff PH; Sheiner NM
    Can J Surg; 1981 Jan; 24(1):50, 52. PubMed ID: 7459735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The abnormal mammogram radiographic findings, diagnostic options, pathology, and stage of cancer diagnosis.
    McKenna RJ
    Cancer; 1994 Jul; 74(1 Suppl):244-55. PubMed ID: 8004594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: clinical, pathologic, and mammographic features.
    Beute BJ; Kalisher L; Hutter RV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Aug; 157(2):257-65. PubMed ID: 1853802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast.
    Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award.
    Harvey JA; Fajardo LL; Innis CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec; 161(6):1167-72. PubMed ID: 8249720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic findings after breast augmentation with autologous fat injection.
    Carvajal J; Patiño JH
    Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 19083521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of mammography on breast biopsy.
    Goedde TA; Frykberg ER; Crump JM; Lay SF; Turetsky DB; Linden SS
    Am Surg; 1992 Nov; 58(11):661-6. PubMed ID: 1485695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changing emphasis in breast diagnosis: the surgeon's role in evaluating mammographic abnormalities.
    Sterns EE
    J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Mar; 184(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 9060928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate.
    Lee CH; Philpotts LE; Horvath LJ; Tocino I
    Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 10405741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.