111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15692581)
21. Embryonic stem cell research controversy: focus on the private sector and international sphere.
Kim S
Hastings Womens Law J; 2003; 14(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 16032810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Interaction between the homeodomain proteins Cdx2 and HNF1alpha mediates expression of the lactase-phlorizin hydrolase gene.
Mitchelmore C; Troelsen JT; Spodsberg N; Sjöström H; Norén O
Biochem J; 2000 Mar; 346 Pt 2(Pt 2):529-35. PubMed ID: 10677375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Totipotent and differentiated cells: an ethical difference for therapeutic cloning?
MacKellar C
Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 12755114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Misapplied ethical considerations: U.S. federal stem cell mandates lack global focus and market foresight.
Fowler HL
Cornell Int Law J; 2004; 36(3):521-44. PubMed ID: 16602208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology.
Priest JA
Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Bioethics today, bioethics tomorrow: stem cell research and the "dignitarian alliance".
Brownsword R
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2003; 17(1):15-51. PubMed ID: 14986644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Promoting life?: Embryonic stem cell research legislation.
Miller JF
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2003; 52(2):437-79. PubMed ID: 15214335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. How to talk about cloning without talking about cloning: public discourse in the UK.
Sexton S
Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):106-14. PubMed ID: 12755112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Dipping into Uncle Sam's pockets: federal funding of stem cell research: is it legal?
Goldstein C
Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 2002; 11(2-3):229-59. PubMed ID: 15212067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. UK ethicists back use of stem cells.
Dickson D
Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6779):697. PubMed ID: 10809627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Cdx2 acts downstream of cell polarization to cell-autonomously promote trophectoderm fate in the early mouse embryo.
Ralston A; Rossant J
Dev Biol; 2008 Jan; 313(2):614-29. PubMed ID: 18067887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Federal embryo research is backed: ethicists see benefits overriding qualms.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Sexless reproduction: a status symbol.
Havard M; Magnus D
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Mar; 11(3):1. PubMed ID: 21400372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A long process that led Bush to his decision.
Seelye KQ; Bruni F
N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():A1, A10. PubMed ID: 12154833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Causative vs. beneficial complicity in the embryonic stem cell debate.
Robertson JA
Conn Law Rev; 2004; 36(4):1099-113. PubMed ID: 15868676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Scientists, ethicists ponder challenges in moving stem cell research forward.
Hampton T
JAMA; 2006 Dec; 296(21):2542-3. PubMed ID: 17148716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Embryonic stem cell research: can the law balance ethical, scientific and economic values? (Part II).
Chalmers D; Nicol D
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):91-108. PubMed ID: 15032099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Altered nuclear transfer.
Hurlbut WB
N Engl J Med; 2005 Mar; 352(11):1153-4; author reply 1153-4. PubMed ID: 15784673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Egregious error or admirable advance: the memorandum of understanding that enables federally funded basic human embryonic stem cell research.
Ligler A
Duke Law Technol Rev; 2001 Oct; ():E1. PubMed ID: 15709294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Blastocyst transfer (sic) is no solution.
Robertson JA
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):18-20; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
