153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15693245)
1. Slashing administrative waste. Pennsylvania medical group uses Web technology to reduce the expense of interacting with health plans.
Health Manag Technol; 2005 Jan; 26(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 15693245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Keeping up with changing managed care rules.
Exec Solut Healthc Manag; 2000 Feb; 3(2):11-2. PubMed ID: 11066316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Internet: a low-cost method of electronic claims submission.
Kaufmann CM; Bennett S
Patient Acc; 1999 Sep; 22(9):2-3. PubMed ID: 10621472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Some medical groups prefer to grow their own DM programs.
Cross M
Manag Care; 2000 Jan; 9(1):25-7, 30. PubMed ID: 10977662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. What works. (Almost) immediate gratification. WellStar Physicians Group.
LeBrun M
Health Manag Technol; 2005 May; 26(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 15932070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Compensation challenges in specialist groups: a guide for the uninitiated.
Zismer DK
Physician Perform Paym Rep; 1999 Dec; 1(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 10982530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Making it click. Providers are hanging up the phones and heading for the Internet to communicate with health plans. Web-based tools are saving time and money on both ends.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 2003 Oct; 33(43):24-5, 34. PubMed ID: 14626613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What works. Payer contracts: the key to practice revenue. A Tennessee-based medical group identifies potential underpayments, negotiates better payer contracts and strengthens their bottom line.
Tacker S
Health Manag Technol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):22, 24. PubMed ID: 16548383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reconcilable differences: mending payer-provider relationships.
Gordon J
Healthc Financ Manage; 2004 Aug; 58(8):44-7. PubMed ID: 15372808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Crunching data on the Web.
Goedert J
Health Data Manag; 2001 Feb; 9(2):40, 42, 44. PubMed ID: 11272396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Netting managed care transactions.
Goedert J
Health Data Manag; 2002 Jan; 10(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 11828960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The cost of health insurance administration in California: estimates for insurers, physicians, and hospitals.
Kahn JG; Kronick R; Kreger M; Gans DN
Health Aff (Millwood); 2005; 24(6):1629-39. PubMed ID: 16284038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the "business of medicine".
Barrett JP
J Miss State Med Assoc; 2009 Feb; 50(2):51-2. PubMed ID: 19297946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing rejections, revitalizing revenue.
Devin T
Health Manag Technol; 2007 Sep; 28(9):38-9. PubMed ID: 17902454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. HHS issues administrative simplification regulations that could save billions of dollars and streamline operations.
Tennant R
MGMA Connex; 2012 Mar; 12(3):18-20. PubMed ID: 22432222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Using technology to reduce administrative hassle and cost.
Data Strateg Benchmarks; 2000 Sep; 4(9):137-8, 129. PubMed ID: 11116480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What works. Pediatric group cuts staff, billing cycle; reduces claims cost to a dime with Internet processing.
Beauchamp G
Health Manag Technol; 1998 Aug; 19(9):38. PubMed ID: 10182549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Be alert as new managed care law provisions go into effect.
Pa Med; 1999 Apr; 102(4):1, 2. PubMed ID: 10230265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Small animal practice: billing, third-party payment options, and pet health insurance.
Dunn L
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2006 Mar; 36(2):411-8, vii. PubMed ID: 16442451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Driven to distress. Medical groups fret over expected billing challenges as more companies steer employees to consumer-driven health plants.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2006 Jan; 36(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 16445211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
