268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15693729)
1. Q-TWiST analysis of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, fluorouracil versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil treatment for premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer.
Radice D; Redaelli A
Pharmacoeconomics; 2005; 23(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 15693729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
Levine MN; Bramwell VH; Pritchard KI; Norris BD; Shepherd LE; Abu-Zahra H; Findlay B; Warr D; Bowman D; Myles J; Arnold A; Vandenberg T; MacKenzie R; Robert J; Ottaway J; Burnell M; Williams CK; Tu D
J Clin Oncol; 1998 Aug; 16(8):2651-8. PubMed ID: 9704715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer: update of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Trial MA5.
Levine MN; Pritchard KI; Bramwell VH; Shepherd LE; Tu D; Paul N;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Aug; 23(22):5166-70. PubMed ID: 16051958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil for node-positive breast cancer: a lifetime cost-utility analysis based on a modified Q-TWIST method.
Trippoli S; Becagli P; Messori A
Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 1997; 53(3-4):281-2. PubMed ID: 9476047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil with node-positive breast cancer in Japan.
Kimura M; Tominaga T; Takatsuka Y; Toi M; Abe R; Koyama H; Takashima S; Nomura Y; Miura S; Kimijima I; Tashiro H; Ohashi Y;
Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 19575284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive operable breast cancer: results of a randomized trial. The International Collaborative Cancer Group.
Coombes RC; Bliss JM; Wils J; Morvan F; Espié M; Amadori D; Gambrosier P; Richards M; Aapro M; Villar-Grimalt A; McArdle C; Pérez-López FR; Vassilopoulos P; Ferreira EP; Chilvers CE; Coombes G; Woods EM; Marty M
J Clin Oncol; 1996 Jan; 14(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 8558217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose-intensive epirubicin-based chemotherapy is superior to an intensive intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil regimen in metastatic breast cancer: a randomized multinational study.
Ackland SP; Anton A; Breitbach GP; Colajori E; Tursi JM; Delfino C; Efremidis A; Ezzat A; Fittipaldo A; Kolaric K; Lopez M; Viaro D;
J Clin Oncol; 2001 Feb; 19(4):943-53. PubMed ID: 11181656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidence and prognostic impact of amenorrhea during adjuvant therapy in high-risk premenopausal breast cancer: analysis of a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study--NCIC CTG MA.5.
Parulekar WR; Day AG; Ottaway JA; Shepherd LE; Trudeau ME; Bramwell V; Levine M; Pritchard KI;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Sep; 23(25):6002-8. PubMed ID: 16135468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, fluorouracil, and vincristine versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil: final report after a 16-year median follow-up duration.
Misset JL; di Palma M; Delgado M; Plagne R; Chollet P; Fumoleau P; Le Mevel B; Belpomme D; Guerrin J; Fargeot P; Metz R; Ithzaki M; Hill C; Mathé G
J Clin Oncol; 1996 Apr; 14(4):1136-45. PubMed ID: 8648368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) versus CMF followed by epirubicin in patients with node-negative or 1-3 node-positive rapidly proliferating breast cancer.
Amadori D; Silvestrini R; De Lena M; Boccardo F; Rocca A; Scarpi E; Schittulli F; Brandi M; Maltoni R; Serra P; Ponzone R; Biglia N; Gianni L; Tienghi A; Valerio MR; Bonginelli P; Amaducci L; Faedi M; Baldini E; Paradiso A
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Feb; 125(3):775-84. PubMed ID: 21132360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) versus hormonal ablation with leuprorelin acetate as adjuvant treatment of node-positive, premenopausal breast cancer patients: preliminary results of the TABLE-study (Takeda Adjuvant Breast cancer study with Leuprorelin Acetate).
Schmid P; Untch M; Wallwiener D; Kossé V; Bondar G; Vassiljev L; Tarutinov V; Kienle E; Lüftner D; Possinger K;
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(4):2325-32. PubMed ID: 12174922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk of acute leukemia following epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy: a report from the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
Crump M; Tu D; Shepherd L; Levine M; Bramwell V; Pritchard K
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Aug; 21(16):3066-71. PubMed ID: 12915595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postoperative dose-dense sequential versus concomitant administration of epirubicin and paclitaxel in patients with node-positive breast cancer: 5-year results of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group HE 10/00 phase III Trial.
Gogas H; Dafni U; Karina M; Papadimitriou C; Batistatou A; Bobos M; Kalofonos HP; Eleftheraki AG; Timotheadou E; Bafaloukos D; Christodoulou C; Markopoulos C; Briasoulis E; Papakostas P; Samantas E; Kosmidis P; Stathopoulos GP; Karanikiotis C; Pectasides D; Dimopoulos MA; Fountzilas G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 132(2):609-19. PubMed ID: 22187126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phase III trial comparing two dose levels of epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer.
Piccart MJ; Di Leo A; Beauduin M; Vindevoghel A; Michel J; Focan C; Tagnon A; Ries F; Gobert P; Finet C; Closon-Dejardin MT; Dufrane JP; Kerger J; Liebens F; Beauvois S; Bartholomeus S; Dolci S; Lobelle JP; Paesmans M; Nogaret JM
J Clin Oncol; 2001 Jun; 19(12):3103-10. PubMed ID: 11408507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil versus paclitaxel followed by epirubicin and vinorelbine in patients with high-risk operable breast cancer.
Boccardo F; Amadori D; Guglielmini P; Sismondi P; Farris A; Agostara B; Gambi A; Catalano G; Faedi M; Rubagotti A
Oncology; 2010; 78(3-4):274-81. PubMed ID: 20530973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in premenopausal women with axillary lymph node positive breast carcinoma.
Bang SM; Heo DS; Lee KH; Byun JH; Chang HM; Noh DY; Choe KJ; Bang YJ; Kim SR; Kim NK
Cancer; 2000 Dec; 89(12):2521-6. PubMed ID: 11135211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved outcome from substituting methotrexate with epirubicin: results from a randomised comparison of CMF versus CEF in patients with primary breast cancer.
Ejlertsen B; Mouridsen HT; Jensen MB; Andersen J; Cold S; Edlund P; Ewertz M; Jensen BB; Kamby C; Nordenskjold B; Bergh J
Eur J Cancer; 2007 Mar; 43(5):877-84. PubMed ID: 17306974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantifying trade-offs: quality of life and quality-adjusted survival in a randomised trial of chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer.
Bernhard J; Zahrieh D; Coates AS; Gelber RD; Castiglione-Gertsch M; Murray E; Forbes JF; Perey L; Collins J; Snyder R; Rudenstam CM; Crivellari D; Veronesi A; Thürlimann B; Fey MF; Price KN; Goldhirsch A; Hürny C
Br J Cancer; 2004 Nov; 91(11):1893-901. PubMed ID: 15545973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized, controlled trial of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil with and without tamoxifen for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer: treatment results of Intergroup Protocol INT-0102.
Hutchins LF; Green SJ; Ravdin PM; Lew D; Martino S; Abeloff M; Lyss AP; Allred C; Rivkin SE; Osborne CK
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Nov; 23(33):8313-21. PubMed ID: 16293862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer.
Baldini E; Gardin G; Giannessi PG; Evangelista G; Roncella M; Prochilo T; Collecchi P; Rosso R; Lionetto R; Bruzzi P; Mosca F; Conte PF
Ann Oncol; 2003 Feb; 14(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 12562649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
