249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15693786)
1. Assessment of myocardial viability by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Lloyd SG; Gupta H
Echocardiography; 2005 Feb; 22(2):179-93. PubMed ID: 15693786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in assessing myocardial viability.
Kwong RY; Korlakunta H
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Feb; 19(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 18690157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of myocardial viability.
Thomson LE; Kim RJ; Judd RM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jun; 19(6):771-88. PubMed ID: 15170783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging in determination of myocardial ischemia and viability: comparison with positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography in a porcine model.
Wang L; Zhu HY; Tian JM; Huang SD; Kong LS; Lu JP
Acta Radiol; 2007 Jun; 48(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 17520425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methods of assessment and clinical relevance of myocardial hibernation and stunning. Assessment of myocardial viability.
Baer FM; Erdmann E
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1998 Sep; 46 Suppl 2():264-9. PubMed ID: 9822177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of myocardial necrosis early after acute myocardial infarction.
Ibrahim T; Bülow HP; Hackl T; Hörnke M; Nekolla SG; Breuer M; Schömig A; Schwaiger M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Jan; 49(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 17222732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of myocardial viability: review of the clinical significance.
Ramos M; DePasquale E; Coplan NL
Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2008; 9(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 19122580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of myocardial viability in ischemic heart disease by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Muellerleile K; Barmeyer A; Groth M; Lund GK
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2008 Apr; 56(2):237-49. PubMed ID: 18319702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of reversible myocardial dysfunction in chronic ischaemic heart disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance and a combined positron emission tomography-single photon emission computed tomography imaging protocol.
Kühl HP; Lipke CS; Krombach GA; Katoh M; Battenberg TF; Nowak B; Heussen N; Buecker A; Schaefer WM
Eur Heart J; 2006 Apr; 27(7):846-53. PubMed ID: 16434414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Myocardial hibernation: a noninvasive physician's point of view.
Bonow RO
Ital Heart J; 2002 May; 3(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 12066559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging techniques for the assessment of myocardial hibernation. Report of a Study Group of the European Society of Cardiology.
Underwood SR; Bax JJ; vom Dahl J; Henein MY; Knuuti J; van Rossum AC; Schwarz ER; Vanoverschelde JL; van der Wall EE; Wijns W;
Eur Heart J; 2004 May; 25(10):815-36. PubMed ID: 15140530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiac magnetic resonance evaluation of myocardial viability and ischemia.
Strzelczyk J; Attili A
Semin Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 43(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 18486681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of reversible myocardial dysfunction by magnetic resonance imaging.
Fedele F; Scopinaro F; Montesano T; Di Cesare E; Di Renzi P; Vitarelli A; Dagianti A
Herz; 1994 Aug; 19(4):210-20. PubMed ID: 7959535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical applications of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Pilz G; Heer T; Harrer E; Ali E; Hoefling B
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2009 Jun; 57(3):299-313. PubMed ID: 19513011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Myocardial viability imaging and revascularization in chronic ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Tajouri TH; Chareonthaitawee P
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2010 Jan; 8(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 20014935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Contrast-enhanced MR and MSCT for the assessment of myocardial viability].
Mahnken AH; Günther RW; Krombach G
Rofo; 2006 Aug; 178(8):771-80. PubMed ID: 16862503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Use of magnetic resonance in the diagnostics of ischemic heart disease].
Krupiński M; Miszalski-Jamka T; Klimeczek P; Banyś RP; Pasowicz M
Przegl Lek; 2010; 67(3):201-4. PubMed ID: 20687385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging is superior to cardiac scintigraphy to identify nonresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Yokokawa M; Tada H; Toyama T; Koyama K; Naito S; Oshima S; Taniguchi K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Mar; 32 Suppl 1():S57-62. PubMed ID: 19250113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel cardiovascular MRI and CT methods for evaluation of ischemic heart disease.
Vogel-Claussen J; Fishman EK; Bluemke DA
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2007 Jul; 5(4):791-802. PubMed ID: 17605656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Functional outcome after revascularization in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: a quantitative late gadolinium enhancement CMR study evaluating transmural scar extent, wall thickness and periprocedural necrosis.
Bondarenko O; Beek AM; Nijveldt R; McCann GP; van Dockum WG; Hofman MB; Twisk JW; Visser CA; van Rossum AC
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(5):815-21. PubMed ID: 17891620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
