BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15694076)

  • 1. An evaluation of methods assessing the physical demands of manual lifting in scaffolding.
    van der Beek AJ; Erik Mathiassen S; Windhorst J; Burdorf A
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Mar; 36(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 15694076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revised NIOSH equation for manual lifting: a method for job evaluation.
    Garg A
    AAOHN J; 1995 Apr; 43(4):211-6; quiz 217-8. PubMed ID: 7772206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New procedure for assessing sequential manual lifting jobs using the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
    Waters TR; Lu ML; Occhipinti E
    Ergonomics; 2007 Nov; 50(11):1761-70. PubMed ID: 17972201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.
    Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Fine LJ
    Ergonomics; 1993 Jul; 36(7):749-76. PubMed ID: 8339717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The revised NIOSH lifting guidelines. Application in a hospital setting.
    Steinbrecher SM
    AAOHN J; 1994 Feb; 42(2):62-6. PubMed ID: 8147989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methods for assessing the physical demands of manual lifting: a review and case study from warehousing.
    Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Baron S
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):871-81. PubMed ID: 9866167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When is it safe to manually lift a patient?
    Waters TR
    Am J Nurs; 2007 Aug; 107(8):53-8; quiz 59. PubMed ID: 17667392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of commonly used lifting assessment methods to identify industrial jobs associated with elevated risk of low-back disorders.
    Marras WS; Fine LJ; Ferguson SA; Waters TR
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):229-45. PubMed ID: 9973881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Usability of the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
    Dempsey PG
    Ergonomics; 2002 Oct; 45(12):817-28. PubMed ID: 12487684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cross-validation of the NIOSH limits for manual lifting.
    Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J
    Ergonomics; 1995 Dec; 38(12):2455-64. PubMed ID: 8586075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of adjusting working height and mechanizing of transport on physical work demands and local discomfort in construction work.
    van der Molen HF; Grouwstra R; Kuijer PP; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Jun; 47(7):772-83. PubMed ID: 15204287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Study on lifting-related musculoskeletal disorders among workers in metal processing].
    Xiao GB; Lei L; Dempsey P; Ma ZH; Liang YX
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 22(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 15130432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Four assessment tools of ergonomics interventions: case study at an electric utility's warehouse system.
    Marklin RW; Wilzbacher JR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 10635543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical demands analysis of occupational tasks in neighborhood pubs.
    Jones T; Strickfaden M; Kumar S
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Sep; 36(5):535-45. PubMed ID: 15927141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Participatory ergonomic intervention for prevention of low back pain: assembly line redesign case.
    Bernardes JM; Wanderck C; Moro AR
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():5993-8. PubMed ID: 22317739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of asymmetry on psychophysical lifting capacity for three lifting types.
    Han B; Stobbe TJ; Hobbs GR
    Ergonomics; 2005 Mar; 48(4):364-79. PubMed ID: 15804846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of block weight on work demands and physical workload during masonry work.
    Van Der Molen HF; Kuijer PP; Hopmans PP; Houweling AG; Faber GS; Hoozemans MJ; Frings-Dresen MH
    Ergonomics; 2008 Mar; 51(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 17896225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Occupational back belt use: a literature review.
    Hodgson EA
    AAOHN J; 1996 Sep; 44(9):438-43. PubMed ID: 8924067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between low back discomfort ratings and the NIOSH lifting index.
    Wang MJ; Garg A; Chang YC; Shih YC; Yeh WY; Lee CL
    Hum Factors; 1998 Sep; 40(3):509-15. PubMed ID: 9849108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comprehensive lifting model: beyond the NIOSH lifting equation.
    Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J
    Ergonomics; 1997 Sep; 40(9):916-27. PubMed ID: 9306742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.