These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15694249)
1. Gender-specific sensitivity to low frequencies in male speech. Hunter MD; Phang SY; Lee KH; Woodruff PW Neurosci Lett; 2005 Mar; 375(3):148-50. PubMed ID: 15694249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relative contributions of speaking fundamental frequency and formant frequencies to gender identification based on isolated vowels. Gelfer MP; Mikos VA J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):544-54. PubMed ID: 16301101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Voice similarity in identical twins. Van Gysel WD; Vercammen J; Debruyne F Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 2001; 55(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 11256192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The speaker's formant. Bele IV J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):555-78. PubMed ID: 16325374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Voice-over: perceptual and acoustic analysis of vocal features. Medrado R; Ferreira LP; Behlau M J Voice; 2005 Sep; 19(3):340-9. PubMed ID: 16102662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influences of fundamental frequency, formant frequencies, aperiodicity, and spectrum level on the perception of voice gender. Skuk VG; Schweinberger SR J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 57(1):285-96. PubMed ID: 23882002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perception of emotional valences and activity levels from vowel segments of continuous speech. Waaramaa T; Laukkanen AM; Airas M; Alku P J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 19111438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vocal projection in actors: the long-term average spectral features that distinguish comfortable acting voice from voicing with maximal projection in male actors. Pinczower R; Oates J J Voice; 2005 Sep; 19(3):440-53. PubMed ID: 16102670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EGG open quotient in aging voices--changes with increasing chronological age and its perception. Winkler R; Sendlmeier W Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 16754276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing. Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speaking rate and fundamental frequency as speech cues to perceived age. Harnsberger JD; Shrivastav R; Brown WS; Rothman H; Hollien H J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16968663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of specific exertion on the efficiency and ease of the voice: a pilot study. Bagnall AD; McCulloch K J Voice; 2005 Sep; 19(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 16102665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What the voice reveals: within- and between-category stereotyping on the basis of voice. Ko SJ; Judd CM; Blair IV Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Jun; 32(6):806-19. PubMed ID: 16648205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acoustic and perceptual analysis of modal and falsetto registers in females with dysphonia. Li NY; Yiu EM Clin Linguist Phon; 2006 Aug; 20(6):463-81. PubMed ID: 16815791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Voice field measurements--a new method of examination: the influence of hearing on the human voice. Lejska M J Voice; 2004 Jun; 18(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 15193654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]