These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15694885)

  • 1. Using qualitative studies to improve the usability of an EMR.
    Rose AF; Schnipper JL; Park ER; Poon EG; Li Q; Middleton B
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Feb; 38(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 15694885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pre-post evaluation of physicians' satisfaction with a redesigned electronic medical record system.
    Jaspers MW; Peute LW; Lauteslager A; Bakker PJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():303-8. PubMed ID: 18487748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How will we know if it's working? A multi-faceted approach to measuring usability of a specialty-specific electronic medical record.
    Hollin I; Griffin M; Kachnowski S
    Health Informatics J; 2012 Sep; 18(3):219-32. PubMed ID: 23011817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human factors considerations relevant to CPOE implementations.
    Saathoff A
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2005; 19(3):71-8. PubMed ID: 16045087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A case study on better iconographic design in electronic medical records' user interface.
    Tasa UB; Ozcan O; Yantac AE; Unluer A
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2008 Jun; 33(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 18604756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A user-centered framework for redesigning health care interfaces.
    Johnson CM; Johnson TR; Zhang J
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Feb; 38(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 15694887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.
    Lium JT; Tjora A; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18186935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.
    Kushniruk AW; Patel VL
    J Biomed Inform; 2004 Feb; 37(1):56-76. PubMed ID: 15016386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electronic medical records in solo/small groups: a qualitative study of physician user types.
    Miller RH; Sim I; Newman J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):658-62. PubMed ID: 15360895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Implementation of a web based software for documentation and control of quality of an acute pain service].
    Pawlik MT; Abel R; Abt G; Kieninger M; Graf BM; Taeger K; Ittner KP
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2009 Jul; 44(7-8):548-51. PubMed ID: 19629917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The contribution of apparent and inherent usability to a user's satisfaction in a searching and browsing task on the Web.
    Fu L; Salvendy G
    Ergonomics; 2002 May; 45(6):415-24. PubMed ID: 12061966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human-centered computing in health information systems. Part 1: analysis and design.
    Zhang J
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Feb; 38(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 15694880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding technology adoption in clinical care: clinician adoption behavior of a point-of-care reminder system.
    Zheng K; Padman R; Johnson MP; Diamond HS
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Aug; 74(7-8):535-43. PubMed ID: 16043083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heuristic evaluation of paper-based Web pages: a simplified inspection usability methodology.
    Allen M; Currie LM; Bakken S; Patel VL; Cimino JJ
    J Biomed Inform; 2006 Aug; 39(4):412-23. PubMed ID: 16321575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electronic medical records: are physicians ready?
    Dansky KH; Gamm LD; Vasey JJ; Barsukiewicz CK
    J Healthc Manag; 1999; 44(6):440-54; discussion 454-5. PubMed ID: 10662431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Realizing electronic medical record benefits: an easy-to-do usability study.
    Harrington L; Porch L; Acosta K; Wilkens K
    J Nurs Adm; 2011; 41(7-8):331-5. PubMed ID: 21799365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decision support for acute problems: the role of the standardized patient in usability testing.
    Linder JA; Rose AF; Palchuk MB; Chang F; Schnipper JL; Chan JC; Middleton B
    J Biomed Inform; 2006 Dec; 39(6):648-55. PubMed ID: 16442853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human-centered computing in health information systems part 2: evaluation.
    Zhang J
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Jun; 38(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 15896690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating physician satisfaction regarding user interactions with an electronic medical record system.
    Sittig DF; Kuperman GJ; Fiskio J
    Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; ():400-4. PubMed ID: 10566389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systems engineering perspective on the human-centered design of health information systems.
    Samaras GM; Horst RL
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Feb; 38(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 15694886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.