141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15695080)
1. Intra-operative assessment of excision margins using breast imprint and scrape cytology.
Muttalib M; Tai CC; Briant-Evans T; Maheswaran I; Livni N; Shousha S; Sinnett HD
Breast; 2005 Feb; 14(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 15695080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients.
Bakhshandeh M; Tutuncuoglu SO; Fischer G; Masood S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):656-9. PubMed ID: 17854083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The consequence of multiple re-excisions to obtain clear lumpectomy margins in breast cancer patients.
Menes TS; Tartter PI; Bleiweiss I; Godbold JH; Estabrook A; Smith SR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Nov; 12(11):881-5. PubMed ID: 16195834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery.
Fleming FJ; Hill AD; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins NJ; Quinn CM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15028301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins.
Cox CE; Pendas S; Ku NN; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HS; Nicosia SV
Am Surg; 1998 Jun; 64(6):533-7; discussion 537-8. PubMed ID: 9619174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology following lumpectomy for breast cancer: a series of 400 procedures.
D'Halluin F; Tas P; Rouquette S; Bendavid C; Foucher F; Meshba H; Blanchot J; Coué O; Levêque J
Breast; 2009 Aug; 18(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 19515566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of excision margins following wide local excision for breast carcinoma using specimen scrape cytology and tumour bed biopsy.
England DW; Chan SY; Stonelake PS; Lee MJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1994 Aug; 20(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 8076703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?
Jacobson AF; Asad J; Boolbol SK; Osborne MP; Boachie-Adjei K; Feldman SM
Am J Surg; 2008 Oct; 196(4):556-8. PubMed ID: 18809063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Local control in 118 consecutive high-risk breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Vordermark D; Lackenbauer A; Wulf J; Guckenberger M; Flentje M
Oncol Rep; 2007 Nov; 18(5):1335-9. PubMed ID: 17914594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Local recurrence in lumpectomy patients after imprint cytology margin evaluation.
Weinberg E; Cox C; Dupont E; White L; Ebert M; Greenberg H; Diaz N; Vercel V; Centeno B; Cantor A; Nicosia S
Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15474425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast-conserving therapy in breast cancer patients--a 12-year experience.
Mannell A
S Afr J Surg; 2005 May; 43(2):28-30; discussion 30, 32. PubMed ID: 16035379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CIH-Tokyo experience with breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy: 6.5 year follow-up results of 1462 patients.
Kasumi F; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Iijima K; Miyagi U; Tada K; Makita M; Iwase T; Oguchi M; Yamashita T; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G
Breast J; 2006; 12(5 Suppl 2):S181-90. PubMed ID: 16958999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18259820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic cavity shaves reduces close margins and re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery.
Janes SE; Stankhe M; Singh S; Isgar B
Breast; 2006 Jun; 15(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 16337123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
