254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15695421)
1. Micromanaging death: process preferences, values, and goals in end-of-life medical decision making.
Hawkins NA; Ditto PH; Danks JH; Smucker WD
Gerontologist; 2005 Feb; 45(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 15695421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How strictly do dialysis patients want their advance directives followed?
Sehgal A; Galbraith A; Chesney M; Schoenfeld P; Charles G; Lo B
JAMA; 1992 Jan; 267(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 1489360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving advance care planning by accommodating family preferences.
Hines SC; Glover JJ; Babrow AS; Holley JL; Badzek LA; Moss AH
J Palliat Med; 2001; 4(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 11798480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.
Shalowitz DI; Garrett-Mayer E; Wendler D
Arch Intern Med; 2006 Mar; 166(5):493-7. PubMed ID: 16534034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advance directives as acts of communication: a randomized controlled trial.
Ditto PH; Danks JH; Smucker WD; Bookwala J; Coppola KM; Dresser R; Fagerlin A; Gready RM; Houts RM; Lockhart LK; Zyzanski S
Arch Intern Med; 2001 Feb; 161(3):421-30. PubMed ID: 11176768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of written advance directives in decision making: insights from qualitative and quantitative data.
Teno JM; Stevens M; Spernak S; Lynn J
J Gen Intern Med; 1998 Jul; 13(7):439-46. PubMed ID: 9686709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses.
Sulmasy DP; Terry PB; Weisman CS; Miller DJ; Stallings RY; Vettese MA; Haller KB
Ann Intern Med; 1998 Apr; 128(8):621-9. PubMed ID: 9537935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acutely Bereaved Surrogates' Stories About the Decision to Limit Life Support in the ICU.
Nunez ER; Schenker Y; Joel ID; Reynolds CF; Dew MA; Arnold RM; Barnato AE
Crit Care Med; 2015 Nov; 43(11):2387-93. PubMed ID: 26327201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modal preferences predict elderly patients' life-sustaining treatment choices as well as patients' chosen surrogates do.
Smucker WD; Houts RM; Danks JH; Ditto PH; Fagerlin A; Coppola KM
Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 10929849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing utilization of life-sustaining treatments with patient and public preferences.
Alpert HR; Emanuel L
J Gen Intern Med; 1998 Mar; 13(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 9541374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Patients' Expressed Wishes on Their Surrogate Decision Makers' Preferred Decision-Making Roles in Japan.
Tsuda S; Nakamura M; Aoki S; Ono H; Takagi M; Ohashi H; Miyachi J; Matsui Y; Ojima T
J Palliat Med; 2018 Mar; 21(3):354-360. PubMed ID: 29148907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deciding on behalf of others: a population survey on procedural preferences for surrogate decision-making.
Frey R; Herzog SM; Hertwig R
BMJ Open; 2018 Jul; 8(7):e022289. PubMed ID: 30049700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. End-of-life decision-making confidence in surrogates of African-American dialysis patients is overly optimistic.
Song MK; Ward SE; Lin FC
J Palliat Med; 2012 Apr; 15(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 22468770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How Surrogates Decide: A Secondary Data Analysis of Decision-Making Principles Used by the Surrogates of Hospitalized Older Adults.
Devnani R; Slaven JE; Bosslet GT; Montz K; Inger L; Burke ES; Torke AM
J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Dec; 32(12):1285-1293. PubMed ID: 28840485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Making decisions for hospitalized older adults: ethical factors considered by family surrogates.
Fritsch J; Petronio S; Helft PR; Torke AM
J Clin Ethics; 2013; 24(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 23923811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. I don't want to be the one saying 'we should just let him die': intrapersonal tensions experienced by surrogate decision makers in the ICU.
Schenker Y; Crowley-Matoka M; Dohan D; Tiver GA; Arnold RM; White DB
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Dec; 27(12):1657-65. PubMed ID: 23011253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
Covinsky KE; Fuller JD; Yaffe K; Johnston CB; Hamel MB; Lynn J; Teno JM; Phillips RS
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S187-93. PubMed ID: 10809474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surrogates' agreement with patients' resuscitation preferences: effect of age, relationship, and SUPPORT intervention. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
Marbella AM; Desbiens NA; Mueller-Rizner N; Layde PM
J Crit Care; 1998 Sep; 13(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 9758029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Voices of African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic surrogates on the burdens of end-of-life decision making.
Braun UK; Beyth RJ; Ford ME; McCullough LB
J Gen Intern Med; 2008 Mar; 23(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 18172738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advance Directive for Research: How Do They Compare with Surrogates' Predictions of Older Adults' Preferences?
Hérault É; Bravo G; Trottier L
IRB; 2018; 40(5):11-19. PubMed ID: 30571899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]