These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15695421)

  • 21. Context changes choices: a prospective study of the effects of hospitalization on life-sustaining treatment preferences.
    Ditto PH; Jacobson JA; Smucker WD; Danks JH; Fagerlin A
    Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(4):313-22. PubMed ID: 16855121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Advance directives and cancer decision making near the end of life.
    Ditto PH; Hawkins NA
    Health Psychol; 2005 Jul; 24(4S):S63-70. PubMed ID: 16045421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of primary care and hospital-based physicians' predictions of elderly outpatients' treatment preferences with and without advance directives.
    Coppola KM; Ditto PH; Danks JH; Smucker WD
    Arch Intern Med; 2001 Feb; 161(3):431-40. PubMed ID: 11176769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Systematic review: Individuals' goals for surrogate decision-making.
    Kelly B; Rid A; Wendler D
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2012 May; 60(5):884-95. PubMed ID: 22469395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Surrogates' predictions of seriously ill patients' resuscitation preferences.
    Layde PM; Beam CA; Broste SK; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Lynn J; Phillips RS; Reding D; Teno J; Vidaillet H
    Arch Fam Med; 1995 Jun; 4(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 7773427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Surviving surrogate decision-making: what helps and hampers the experience of making medical decisions for others.
    Vig EK; Starks H; Taylor JS; Hopley EK; Fryer-Edwards K
    J Gen Intern Med; 2007 Sep; 22(9):1274-9. PubMed ID: 17619223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives.
    Fischer GS; Tulsky JA; Rose MR; Siminoff LA; Arnold RM
    J Gen Intern Med; 1998 Jul; 13(7):447-54. PubMed ID: 9686710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Concordance of preferences for end-of-life care between terminally ill cancer patients and their family caregivers in Taiwan.
    Tang ST; Liu TW; Lai MS; Liu LN; Chen CH
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2005 Dec; 30(6):510-8. PubMed ID: 16376737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Opening the black box: how do physicians communicate about advance directives?
    Tulsky JA; Fischer GS; Rose MR; Arnold RM
    Ann Intern Med; 1998 Sep; 129(6):441-9. PubMed ID: 9735081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are advance directives helpful for good end of life decision making: a cross sectional survey of health professionals.
    Peicius E; Blazeviciene A; Kaminskas R
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Jun; 18(1):40. PubMed ID: 28583175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How do general end-of-life treatment goals and values relate to specific treatment preferences? a population-based study.
    Evans N; Pasman HR; Deeg D; Onwuteaka-Philipsen B;
    Palliat Med; 2014 Dec; 28(10):1206-12. PubMed ID: 24942283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correspondence between patients' preferences and surrogates' understandings for dying and death.
    Engelberg RA; Patrick DL; Curtis JR
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2005 Dec; 30(6):498-509. PubMed ID: 16376736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do advance directives provide instructions that direct care? SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
    Teno JM; Licks S; Lynn J; Wenger N; Connors AF; Phillips RS; O'Connor MA; Murphy DP; Fulkerson WJ; Desbiens N; Knaus WA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Apr; 45(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 9100722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making.
    Vig EK; Taylor JS; Starks H; Hopley EK; Fryer-Edwards K
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2006 Nov; 54(11):1688-93. PubMed ID: 17087695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. More talk, less paper: predicting the accuracy of substituted judgments.
    Sulmasy DP; Haller K; Terry PB
    Am J Med; 1994 May; 96(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 8192175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prior capacity of patients lacking decision making ability early in hospitalization: implications for advance directive administration. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Wenger NS; Oye RK; Bellamy PE; Lynn J; Phillips RS; Desbiens NA; Kussin P; Youngner SJ
    J Gen Intern Med; 1994 Oct; 9(10):539-43. PubMed ID: 7823223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Advance care planning and end-of-life decision making in dialysis: a randomized controlled trial targeting patients and their surrogates.
    Song MK; Ward SE; Fine JP; Hanson LC; Lin FC; Hladik GA; Hamilton JB; Bridgman JC
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2015 Nov; 66(5):813-22. PubMed ID: 26141307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Survey of the general public's attitudes toward advance directives in Japan: how to respect patients' preferences.
    Miyata H; Shiraishi H; Kai I
    BMC Med Ethics; 2006 Oct; 7():E11. PubMed ID: 17044943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Advance care planning beyond advance directives: perspectives from patients and surrogates.
    McMahan RD; Knight SJ; Fried TR; Sudore RL
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2013 Sep; 46(3):355-65. PubMed ID: 23200188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Discrepancies in end-of-life decisions between elderly patients and their named surrogates.
    Foo AS; Lee TW; Soh CR
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2012 Apr; 41(4):141-53. PubMed ID: 22635278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.