403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15696140)
1. Pharmacrops and bioterror.
Wuerthele S
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Feb; 23(2):170. PubMed ID: 15696140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. US food safety under siege?
Gilmore R
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Dec; 22(12):1503-5. PubMed ID: 15583650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Better plan needed to protect U.S. agriculture from bioterrorism.
J Environ Health; 2003 Mar; 65(7):40. PubMed ID: 12645424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Title III of the Bioterrorism Act: sacrificing U.S. trade relations in the name of food security.
Boisen CS
Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jan; 56(3):667-718. PubMed ID: 17312612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. NAS issues mixed message on unintended effects of GM food.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1062. PubMed ID: 15340456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reforming the food safety system: what if consolidation isn't enough?
Harv Law Rev; 2007 Mar; 120(5):1345-66. PubMed ID: 17410681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Preface to the journal supplement dedicated to the early awareness of emerging risks to food and feed safety.
Kuiper HA; Kleter GA
Food Chem Toxicol; 2009 May; 47(5):909-10. PubMed ID: 19232377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety assessment, detection and traceability, and societal aspects of genetically modified foods. European Network on Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Food Crops (ENTRANSFOOD). Concluding remarks.
Kuiper HA; König A; Kleter GA; Hammes WP; Knudsen I;
Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):1195-202. PubMed ID: 15123387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rising imports, bioterrorism, and the food supply.
Smith DeWaal C
Food Drug Law J; 2004; 59(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 15586994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Agroterrorism in the U.S.: key security challenge for the 21st century.
Cupp OS; Walker DE; Hillison J
Biosecur Bioterror; 2004; 2(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 15225403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prior notice of imported food under the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002. Final rule.
Food and Drug Administration, HHS
Fed Regist; 2008 Nov; 73(217):66293-410. PubMed ID: 19112701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The hang-up with HACCP: the resistance to translating science into food safety law.
Fortin ND
Food Drug Law J; 2003; 58(4):565-93. PubMed ID: 15027451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy: the importance of precautionary measures to protect the food supply.
DeWaal CS; Vegosen L
Food Drug Law J; 2003; 58(4):537-48. PubMed ID: 15027448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. People would pay more to get safer beef.
Consum Rep; 2004 May; 69(5):7. PubMed ID: 15104076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Orphans at the window.
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1055. PubMed ID: 15340451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. No Munich on GM crops.
Malvoisin P; Grausz JD
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Dec; 22(12):1501; discussion 1501. PubMed ID: 15583648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Are Bt crops safe?
Mendelsohn M; Kough J; Vaituzis Z; Matthews K
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):1003-9. PubMed ID: 12949561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. BRIEF REPORT: recent progress in biodefense countermeasure development.
Mair M
Biosecur Bioterror; 2005; 3(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 16392161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the battle over genetically modified foods finally over?
Saleh-Lakha S; Glick BR
Biotechnol Adv; 2005 Mar; 23(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 15694121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The safety of beef in the United States.
Scheier LM
J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Mar; 105(3):339-40. PubMed ID: 15746815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
