These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15696658)
1. One step ahead. States restructure Medicaid to keep costs in check. Evans M; Galloro V Mod Healthc; 2005 Jan; 35(3):8-9. PubMed ID: 15696658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Facing budget shortfalls, states plan major changes in Medicaid programs. Kertesz L AHIP Cover; 2005; 46(1):8, 10, 58-9. PubMed ID: 15776759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost analyses of the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System: lessons from an eleven-year evaluation. Wrightson CW; McCall N Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1995; 15():79-97. PubMed ID: 10163100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. More, more, more: critical study could mean big changes at Medicaid contracting table. Public Sect Contract Rep; 1997 Mar; 3(3):41-5. PubMed ID: 10175079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of the Utah Prepaid Mental Health Plan. Christianson JB; Gray DZ; Kihlstrom LC; Speckman ZK Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1995; 15():117-35. PubMed ID: 10163093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The state Medicaid crisis: benefits and eligibility on the block. National Conference of State Legislatures' Health Policy Tracking Service Healthc Financ Manage; 2003 May; 57(5):14, 16. PubMed ID: 12772330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A tale of two states. Arizona and Tennessee reinvent Medicaid, but not without pain and perils. Gleick E Time; 1995 Dec; 146(25):31-2, 35-6. PubMed ID: 10172525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Federal government ... needs to restructure its major health programs--Medicare and Medicaid. Starr B State Health Care Am; 1995; ():56-60. PubMed ID: 10168075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How restrictive are Medicaid's categorical eligibility requirements? A look at nine Southern states. Capilouto E; Thorpe KE; Dailey TE Inquiry; 1992; 29(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 1473868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medicaid's future: a political perspective. Tallon JR Front Health Serv Manage; 1998; 14(4):38-40; discussion 41-2. PubMed ID: 10181818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medicaid--implications for the health safety net. Rowland D N Engl J Med; 2005 Oct; 353(14):1439-41. PubMed ID: 16207845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. State Medicaid home care policies: inside the black box. Kitchener M; Ng T; Harrington C Home Health Care Serv Q; 2007; 26(3):23-38. PubMed ID: 17804351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Oregon experience. Must doctors lose money with managed Medicaid? Collins C Manag Care; 1997 Nov; 6(11):45-6, 49-50. PubMed ID: 10176722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Presumptive eligibility: early access to prenatal care. Sadler DK J Tenn Med Assoc; 1989 Feb; 82(2):88-9. PubMed ID: 2648074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. TennCare--a failure of politics, not policy: a conversation with Gordon Bonnyman. Interview by Robert E. Hurley. Bonnyman G Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(3):w217-25. PubMed ID: 16638793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Next steps for Tennessee: a conversation with Gov. Phil Bredesen. Interview by Alan Weil. Bredsen P Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(4):w456-62. PubMed ID: 17519252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simplifying Medi-Cal enrollment: opportunities and challenges in tight fiscal times. Chimento L; Forbes M; Menges J; Theisen A; Pande N Medi-Cal Policy Inst Issue Brief; 2003 Jun; (6):1-12. PubMed ID: 12866511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]