4047 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15698536)
1. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
Gaylor DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. NTP toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 126) (CAS No. 57465-28-8) in female Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats (Gavage Studies).
National Toxicology Program
Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 2006 Jan; (520):4-246. PubMed ID: 16628245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Regulatory cancer risk assessment based on a quick estimate of a benchmark dose derived from the maximum tolerated dose.
Gaylor DW; Swirsky Gold L
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Dec; 28(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 10049793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental design constraints on carcinogenic potency estimates.
Rieth JP; Starr TB
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1989; 27(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 2754755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Epidemiological and experimental applications to occupational cancer prevention.
Vainio H; Hemminki K
J UOEH; 1989 Mar; 11 Suppl():323-45. PubMed ID: 2664947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. NTP carcinogenesis studies of 2,2-bis(bromomethyl)-1,3-propanediol, nitromethane, and 1,2,3-trichloropropane (cas nos. 3296-90-0, 75-52-5, and 96-18-4) in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) and medaka (Oryzias latipes) (Waterborne Studies).
National Toxicology Program
Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 2005 Oct; (528):1-190. PubMed ID: 16362062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chloroform mode of action: implications for cancer risk assessment.
Golden RJ; Holm SE; Robinson DE; Julkunen PH; Reese EA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Oct; 26(2):142-55. PubMed ID: 9356278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A strategy for establishing mode of action of chemical carcinogens as a guide for approaches to risk assessments.
Butterworth BE; Conolly RB; Morgan KT
Cancer Lett; 1995 Jun; 93(1):129-46. PubMed ID: 7600540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Amended final report on the safety assessment of polyacrylamide and acrylamide residues in cosmetics.
Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24 Suppl 2():21-50. PubMed ID: 16154914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of carcinogenicity from two versus four sex-species groups in the carcinogenic potency database.
Gold LS; Slone TH
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1993 May; 39(1):143-57. PubMed ID: 8492327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How useful are chronic (life-span) toxicology studies in rodents in identifying pharmaceuticals that pose a carcinogenic risk to humans?
Monro A
Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev; 1993; 12(1):5-34. PubMed ID: 8513076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of genomic biomarkers to predict increased lung tumor incidence in 2-year rodent cancer bioassays.
Thomas RS; Pluta L; Yang L; Halsey TA
Toxicol Sci; 2007 May; 97(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 17311802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quick estimate of the regulatory virtually safe dose based on the maximum tolerated dose for rodent bioassays.
Gaylor DW; Gold LS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Aug; 22(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 7494904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the utility of the lifetime mouse bioassay in the identification of cancer hazards for humans.
Osimitz TG; Droege W; Boobis AR; Lake BG
Food Chem Toxicol; 2013 Oct; 60():550-62. PubMed ID: 23954551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Critical evaluation of the cancer risk of dibromochloropropane (DBCP).
Clark HA; Snedeker SM
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2005; 23(2):215-60. PubMed ID: 16291528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
