BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15698653)

  • 1. Biofiltration pretreatment for reverse osmosis (RO) membrane in a water reclamation system.
    Hu JY; Song LF; Ong SL; Phua ET; Ng WJ
    Chemosphere; 2005 Mar; 59(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 15698653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrated pretreatment with capacitive deionization for reverse osmosis reject recovery from water reclamation plant.
    Lee LY; Ng HY; Ong SL; Tao G; Kekre K; Viswanath B; Lay W; Seah H
    Water Res; 2009 Oct; 43(18):4769-77. PubMed ID: 19700181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility of supercritical CO₂ treatment for controlling biofouling in the reverse osmosis process.
    Mun S; Baek Y; Kim C; Lee YW; Yoon J
    Biofouling; 2012; 28(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 22726211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of conventional chemical treatment on the microbial population in a biofouling layer of reverse osmosis systems.
    Bereschenko LA; Prummel H; Euverink GJ; Stams AJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):405-16. PubMed ID: 21111441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems.
    Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
    Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
    Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of water reclamation technologies on biological stability of industrial water.
    Ng WJ; Ong SL; Hu JY
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(10):327-34. PubMed ID: 11436798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of microfiltration treatment of secondary wastewater effluent on biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes.
    Herzberg M; Berry D; Raskin L
    Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 19815248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of engineered environment on microbial community structure in biofilter and biofilm on reverse osmosis membrane.
    Jeong S; Cho K; Jeong D; Lee S; Leiknes T; Vigneswaran S; Bae H
    Water Res; 2017 Nov; 124():227-237. PubMed ID: 28759795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contribution of assimilable organic carbon to biological fouling in seawater reverse osmosis membrane treatment.
    Weinrich L; LeChevallier M; Haas CN
    Water Res; 2016 Sep; 101():203-213. PubMed ID: 27262548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
    Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
    Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of direct biofiltration of surface water for reduction of biodegradable organic matter and biofilm formation potential.
    Persson F; Heinicke G; Uhl W; Hedberg T; Hermansson M
    Environ Technol; 2006 Sep; 27(9):1037-45. PubMed ID: 17067130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ozone and biofiltration as an alternative to reverse osmosis for removing PPCPs and micropollutants from treated wastewater.
    Lee CO; Howe KJ; Thomson BM
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(4):1005-14. PubMed ID: 22202904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vanillin, a potential agent to prevent biofouling of reverse osmosis membrane.
    Kappachery S; Paul D; Yoon J; Kweon JH
    Biofouling; 2010 Aug; 26(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 20661790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In-situ biofilm characterization in membrane systems using Optical Coherence Tomography: formation, structure, detachment and impact of flux change.
    Dreszer C; Wexler AD; Drusová S; Overdijk T; Zwijnenburg A; Flemming HC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():243-54. PubMed ID: 25282092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term effect on membrane fouling in a new membrane bioreactor as a pretreatment to seawater desalination.
    Jeong S; Rice SA; Vigneswaran S
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():60-8. PubMed ID: 24745896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low cost reclamation using the Advanced Integrated Wastewater Pond Systems Technology and reverse osmosis.
    Downing JB; Bracco E; Green FB; Ku AY; Lundquist TJ; Zubieta IX; Oswald WJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 11833725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Autopsy of high-pressure membranes to compare effectiveness of MF and UF pretreatment in water reclamation.
    Kim J; DiGiano FA; Reardon RD
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):697-706. PubMed ID: 17961627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.