These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15698653)

  • 61. Scale formation in NF/RO: mechanism and control.
    Lee S; Lee CH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):267-75. PubMed ID: 16003986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Biofouling of reverse-osmosis membranes under different shear rates during tertiary wastewater desalination: microbial community composition.
    Al Ashhab A; Gillor O; Herzberg M
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():86-95. PubMed ID: 25262553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges.
    Greenlee LF; Lawler DF; Freeman BD; Marrot B; Moulin P
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(9):2317-48. PubMed ID: 19371922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Pressure drop increase by biofilm accumulation in spiral wound RO and NF membrane systems: role of substrate concentration, flow velocity, substrate load and flow direction.
    Vrouwenvelder JS; Hinrichs C; Van der Meer WG; Van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC
    Biofouling; 2009; 25(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 19437193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. New process for alleviation of membrane fouling of modified hybrid MBR system for advanced domestic wastewater treatment.
    Shuo L; Baozhen W; Hongjun H; Yanping L
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(10):2059-66. PubMed ID: 19039188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Treatment of vegetable oily wastewater using an integrated microfiltration-reverse osmosis system.
    Yu X; Zhong Z; Xing W
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(2):455-62. PubMed ID: 20107272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Enzymatic cleaning of biofouled thin-film composite reverse osmosis (RO) membrane operated in a biofilm membrane reactor.
    Khan M; Danielsen S; Johansen K; Lorenz L; Nelson S; Camper A
    Biofouling; 2014 Feb; 30(2):153-67. PubMed ID: 24329165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Membrane bioreactors for water reclamation.
    Tao G; Kekre K; Wei Z; Lee TC; Viswanath B; Seah H
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):431-40. PubMed ID: 16004005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Evaluation of microbial regrowth potential by assimilable organic carbon in various reclaimed water and distribution systems.
    Thayanukul P; Kurisu F; Kasuga I; Furumai H
    Water Res; 2013 Jan; 47(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 23134741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Viability of a low-pressure nanofilter in treating recycled water for water reuse applications: a pilot-scale study.
    Bellona C; Drewes JE
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3948-58. PubMed ID: 17582458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Membrane coagulation bioreactor (MCBR) for drinking water treatment.
    Tian JY; Liang H; Li X; You SJ; Tian S; Li GB
    Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):3910-20. PubMed ID: 18674791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Development of an integrated membrane process for water reclamation.
    Lew CH; Hu JY; Song LF; Lee LY; Ong SL; Ng WJ; Seah H
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):455-63. PubMed ID: 16004008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Optimization of gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration process for seawater pretreatment.
    Wu B; Hochstrasser F; Akhondi E; Ambauen N; Tschirren L; Burkhardt M; Fane AG; Pronk W
    Water Res; 2016 Apr; 93():133-140. PubMed ID: 26900974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Development of a novel fouling suppression system in membrane bioreactors using an intermittent electric field.
    Akamatsu K; Lu W; Sugawara T; Nakao S
    Water Res; 2010 Feb; 44(3):825-30. PubMed ID: 19897224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Impact of flow regime on pressure drop increase and biomass accumulation and morphology in membrane systems.
    Vrouwenvelder JS; Buiter J; Riviere M; van der Meer WG; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC
    Water Res; 2010 Feb; 44(3):689-702. PubMed ID: 19836048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A comparison of gravity-driven membrane (GDM) reactor and biofiltration + GDM reactor for seawater reverse osmosis desalination pretreatment.
    Lee S; Suwarno SR; Quek BWH; Kim L; Wu B; Chong TH
    Water Res; 2019 May; 154():72-83. PubMed ID: 30771709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane.
    Valladares Linares R; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Li Z; Amy G
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(20):6737-44. PubMed ID: 22055122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Impact of biofilm accumulation on transmembrane and feed channel pressure drop: effects of crossflow velocity, feed spacer and biodegradable nutrient.
    Dreszer C; Flemming HC; Zwijnenburg A; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Mar; 50():200-11. PubMed ID: 24374131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Application of biofiltration system on AOC removal: column and field studies.
    Chien CC; Kao CM; Chen CW; Dong CD; Wu CY
    Chemosphere; 2008 Apr; 71(9):1786-93. PubMed ID: 18294674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A dual membrane UF/RO process for reclamation of spent rinses from a nickel-plating operation--a case study.
    Qin JJ; Oo MH; Wai MN; Ang CM; Wong FS; Lee H
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(13):3269-78. PubMed ID: 14509715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.