These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15699476)

  • 1. Randomized phase II trials: what does randomization gain?
    Wieand HS
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Mar; 23(9):1794-5. PubMed ID: 15699476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomization in Phase II Clinical Trials.
    Yothers G; Wieand S; Freireich EJ
    Clin Adv Hematol Oncol; 2006 Oct; 4(10):776-8. PubMed ID: 17111561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized phase II trials with a prospective control.
    Jung SH
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):568-83. PubMed ID: 17573688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized phase II trials: inevitable or inadvisable?
    Gan HK; Grothey A; Pond GR; Moore MJ; Siu LL; Sargent D
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 May; 28(15):2641-7. PubMed ID: 20406933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing the wrong hypothesis in phase II oncology trials: there is a better alternative.
    Ratain MJ; Karrison TG
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Feb; 13(3):781-2. PubMed ID: 17289865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the design of phase II trials of cytostatic anticancer agents.
    Stone A; Wheeler C; Barge A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 16843736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Methodological approaches of clinical studies with targeted therapies].
    Penel N; Saleron J; Lansiaux A; Clisant S; Adenis A; Fournier C; Duhamel A; Bonneterre J
    Bull Cancer; 2008 Feb; 95(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 18304903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimizing randomized phase II trials assessing tumor progression.
    Stone A; Wheeler C; Carroll K; Barge A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 16807129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimising the design of phase II oncology trials: the importance of randomisation.
    Ratain MJ; Sargent DJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 19059773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A strategic framework for novel drug development in multiple myeloma.
    Anderson KC; Hannah AL; Pazdur R; Farrell AT
    Br J Haematol; 2007 Jul; 138(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 17593022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Continuous Bayesian adaptive randomization based on event times with covariates.
    Cheung YK; Inoue LY; Wathen JK; Thall PF
    Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):55-70. PubMed ID: 16025549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing an experimental agent to a standard agent: relative merits of a one-arm or randomized two-arm Phase II design.
    Taylor JM; Braun TM; Li Z
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(4):335-48. PubMed ID: 17060208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized phase II designs in cancer clinical trials: current status and future directions.
    Lee JJ; Feng L
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Jul; 23(19):4450-7. PubMed ID: 15994154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early average change in tumor size in a phase 2 trial: efficient endpoint or false promise?
    Rubinstein LV; Dancey JE; Korn EL; Smith MA; Wright JJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1422-3. PubMed ID: 17895470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Newer phase II trial designs gaining ground.
    Benowitz S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1428-9. PubMed ID: 17895467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to ensure clinical trial sensitivity in psychotropic drug development: a case study.
    Videla S; Sust M; Fresquet A; Villoria J
    Clin Ther; 2005 Feb; 27(2):252-4. PubMed ID: 15811489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developing drugs that do not cause tumor regression.
    Stadler W
    Clin Adv Hematol Oncol; 2003 Nov; 1(11):654-5. PubMed ID: 16258462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rationale and design of the enoximone clinical trials program.
    Lowes BD; Shakar SF; Metra M; Feldman AM; Eichhorn E; Freytag JW; Gerber MJ; Liard JF; Hartman C; Gorczynski R; Evans G; Linseman JV; Stewart J; Robertson AD; Roecker EB; Demets DL; Bristow MR
    J Card Fail; 2005 Dec; 11(9):659-69. PubMed ID: 16360960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phase II clinical trial design: methods in translational research from the Genitourinary Committee at the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
    Gray R; Manola J; Saxman S; Wright J; Dutcher J; Atkins M; Carducci M; See W; Sweeney C; Liu G; Stein M; Dreicer R; Wilding G; DiPaola RS
    Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Apr; 12(7 Pt 1):1966-9. PubMed ID: 16609005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomization and concealment in surgical trials: a comparison between orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic randomized trials.
    Li P; Mah D; Lim K; Sprague S; Bhandari M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2005 Feb; 125(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 15565303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.