These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15700703)

  • 1. Assessing ecological effects of radionuclides: data gaps and extrapolation issues.
    Garnier-Laplace J; Gilek M; Sundell-Bergman S; Larsson CM
    J Radiol Prot; 2004 Dec; 24(4A):A139-55. PubMed ID: 15700703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Study of the uncertainty in estimation of the exposure of non-human biota to ionising radiation.
    Avila R; Beresford NA; Agüero A; Broed R; Brown J; Iospje M; Robles B; Suañez A
    J Radiol Prot; 2004 Dec; 24(4A):A105-22. PubMed ID: 15700701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating radionuclide transfer to wild species--data requirements and availability for terrestrial ecosystems.
    Beresford NA; Broadley MR; Howard BJ; Barnett CL; White PJ
    J Radiol Prot; 2004 Dec; 24(4A):A89-103. PubMed ID: 15700700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genotoxic and reprotoxic effects of tritium and external gamma irradiation on aquatic animals.
    Adam-Guillermin C; Pereira S; Della-Vedova C; Hinton T; Garnier-Laplace J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2012; 220():67-103. PubMed ID: 22610297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why is the multiple stressor concept of relevance to radioecology?
    Salbu B; Teien HC; Lind OC; Tollefsen KE
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2019 Jul; 95(7):1015-1024. PubMed ID: 30971149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The FASSET framework for assessment of environmental impact of ionising radiation in European ecosystems--an overview.
    Larsson CM
    J Radiol Prot; 2004 Dec; 24(4A):A1-12. PubMed ID: 15700695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Absorbed dose rate conversion coefficients for reference terrestrial biota for external photon and internal exposures.
    Taranenko V; Pröhl G; Gómez-Ros JM
    J Radiol Prot; 2004 Dec; 24(4A):A35-62. PubMed ID: 15700697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the impact of ionizing radiation on aquatic invertebrates: a critical review.
    Dallas LJ; Keith-Roach M; Lyons BP; Jha AN
    Radiat Res; 2012 May; 177(5):693-716. PubMed ID: 22214380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of ionising radiation exposure on plants, fish and mammals: relevant data for environmental radiation protection.
    Real A; Sundell-Bergman S; Knowles JF; Woodhead DS; Zinger I
    J Radiol Prot; 2004 Dec; 24(4A):A123-37. PubMed ID: 15700702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulation of population response to ionizing radiation in an ecosystem with a limiting resource--Model and analytical solutions.
    Sazykina TG; Kryshev AI
    J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jan; 151 Pt 1():50-57. PubMed ID: 26408836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental impact and risk assessments and key factors contributing to the overall uncertainties.
    Salbu B
    J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jan; 151 Pt 2():352-60. PubMed ID: 26546475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sources, pathways, and relative risks of contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a perspective prepared for the Walkerton inquiry.
    Ritter L; Solomon K; Sibley P; Hall K; Keen P; Mattu G; Linton B
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2002 Jan; 65(1):1-142. PubMed ID: 11809004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subchronic exposure of BALB/c and C57BL/6 strains of Mus musculus to the radioactive environment of the Chornobyl, Ukraine exclusion zone.
    Rodgers BE; Chesser RK; Wickliffe JK; Phillips CJ; Baker RJ
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2001 Dec; 20(12):2830-5. PubMed ID: 11764167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Ranking of radionuclides and pathways according to their contribution to the dose burden to the population resulting from NPP releases].
    Spiridonov SI; Karpenko EI; Sharpan LA
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2013; 53(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 25427373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Principles and issues in radiological ecological risk assessment.
    Jones D; Domotor S; Higley K; Kocher D; Bilyard G
    J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):19-39. PubMed ID: 12590068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overview of programmes for the assessment of risks to the environment from ionising radiation and hazardous chemicals.
    Jones C; Gilek M
    J Radiol Prot; 2004 Dec; 24(4A):A157-77. PubMed ID: 15700704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of non-human species irradiation after the Chernobyl NPP accident.
    Geras'kin SA; Fesenko SV; Alexakhin RM
    Environ Int; 2008 Aug; 34(6):880-97. PubMed ID: 18234336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ecological effects of exposure to enhanced levels of ionizing radiation.
    Geras'kin SA
    J Environ Radioact; 2016 Oct; 162-163():347-357. PubMed ID: 27343462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method for calculation of dose per unit concentration values for aquatic biota.
    Vives i Batlle J; Jones SR; Gómez-Ros JM
    J Radiol Prot; 2004 Dec; 24(4A):A13-34. PubMed ID: 15700696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ICRP Publication 114. Environmental protection: transfer parameters for reference animals and plants.
    Strand P; Beresford N; Copplestone D; Godoy J; Jianguo L; Saxén R; Yankovich T; Brown J;
    Ann ICRP; 2009 Dec; 39(6):1-111. PubMed ID: 22108188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.