These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15701181)
1. Put your money where your mouth is. Parker WH J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 Nov; 11(4):443-4. PubMed ID: 15701181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy: maintenance of skills after a mentorship program. Twijnstra AR; Blikkendaal MD; Kolkman W; Smeets MJ; Rhemrev JP; Jansen FW Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2010; 70(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 20558991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: surgical complications and clinical outcomes. Rieger L; Dietl J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):581-2; author reply 582-3. PubMed ID: 15024757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma. McCall JL; Parry BR Br J Surg; 1997 Aug; 84(8):1174; author reply 1174-5. PubMed ID: 9278683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases. Claerhout F; Deprest J Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 19(3):357-75. PubMed ID: 15985252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multicenter randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidates. Patsner B Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 93(1):160; author reply 161. PubMed ID: 9916979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A multicenter randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidates. Spellacy WN Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 93(1):160-1. PubMed ID: 9916980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma. Papagrigoriadis S Br J Surg; 1997 Aug; 84(8):1173-4; author reply 1174-5. PubMed ID: 9278682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Vaginal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Gendy R; Walsh CA; Walsh SR; Karantanis E Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 204(5):388.e1-8. PubMed ID: 21377140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared to vaginal and abdominal procedures. Shehmar M; Gupta J; Burton C; Tootz-Hobson P BJOG; 2009 Sep; 116(10):1415; author reply 1416. PubMed ID: 19691633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: surgical complications and clinical outcomes. Esdaile BA; Chalian RA; Del Priore G; Smith JR Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):581; author reply 582-3. PubMed ID: 14990424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications and recovery from laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Seidman DS Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 89(6):1050-1. PubMed ID: 9170492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective comparison of tissue trauma after laparoscopic hysterectomy types with retroperitoneal lateral transsection of uterine vessels using ligasure and abdominal hysterectomy. Demir A; Bige O; Saatli B; Solak A; Saygili U; Onvural A Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 17952446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tissue trauma in abdominal and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Atabekoglu C; Sönmezer M; Güngör M; Aytaç R; Ortaç F; Unlü C J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 Nov; 11(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 15701187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]