599 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15701212)
1. Comparative efficacy of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Abelson MB; Greiner JV
Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Dec; 20(12):1953-8. PubMed ID: 15701212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine 0.2% versus epinastine 0.05% ophthalmic solution for treating itching and redness induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
Mah FS; Rosenwasser LJ; Townsend WD; Greiner JV; Bensch G
Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Jun; 23(6):1445-52. PubMed ID: 17559743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the clinical efficacy of pheniramine maleate/naphazoline hydrochloride ophthalmic solution and olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Greiner JV; Udell IJ
Clin Ther; 2005 May; 27(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 15978305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Time to onset and duration of action of the antihistamine bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solutions 1.0% and 1.5% in allergic conjunctivitis: a phase III, single-center, prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, conjunctival allergen challenge assessment in adults and children.
Abelson MB; Torkildsen GL; Williams JI; Gow JA; Gomes PJ; McNamara TR;
Clin Ther; 2009 Sep; 31(9):1908-21. PubMed ID: 19843481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the relative efficacy and clinical performance of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival antigen challenge model.
Berdy GJ; Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy SS; Brusatti RC
Clin Ther; 2000 Jul; 22(7):826-33. PubMed ID: 10945509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy and response with olopatadine versus epinastine in ocular allergic symptoms: a post hoc analysis of data from a conjunctival allergen challenge study.
Finegold I; Granet DB; D'Arienzo PA; Epstein AB
Clin Ther; 2006 Oct; 28(10):1630-8. PubMed ID: 17157118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of olopatadine, a new ophthalmic antiallergic agent with dual activity, using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Abelson MB
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1998 Sep; 81(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 9759796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine vs epinastine ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Lanier BQ; Finegold I; D'Arienzo P; Granet D; Epstein AB; Ledgerwood GL
Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Aug; 20(8):1227-33. PubMed ID: 15324525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Emedastine ophthalmic solution 0.05% versus levocabastine ophthalmic suspension 0.05% in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Netland PA; Leahy C; Krenzer KL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 130(6):717-23. PubMed ID: 11124289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of comfort using olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers compared to placebo using the conjunctival allergen-challenge model.
Brodsky M; Berger WE; Butrus S; Epstein AB; Irkec M
Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Apr; 29(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12695716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized, double-masked comparison of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, mometasone furoate monohydrate nasal spray, and fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets using the conjunctival and nasal allergen challenge models.
Spangler DL; Abelson MB; Ober A; Gotnes PJ
Clin Ther; 2003 Aug; 25(8):2245-67. PubMed ID: 14512132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy GJ
Clin Ther; 2001 Aug; 23(8):1272-80. PubMed ID: 11558863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prolonged effectiveness of bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution for the treatment of ocular symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.
Williams JI; Kennedy KS; Gow JA; Torkildsen GL; Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; McNamara TR;
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Aug; 27(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 21649522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of once-daily olopatadine 0.2% ophthalmic solution compared to twice-daily olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution for the treatment of ocular itching induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
Abelson MB; Spangler DL; Epstein AB; Mah FS; Crampton HJ
Curr Eye Res; 2007 Dec; 32(12):1017-22. PubMed ID: 18085465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of olopatadine ophthalmic solution (0.1%) versus ketorolac ophthalmic solution (0.5%) using the provocative antigen challenge model.
Deschenes J; Discepola M; Abelson M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 1999; (228):47-52. PubMed ID: 10337433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the efficacy of combined fluticasone propionate and olopatadine versus combined fluticasone propionate and fexofenadine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
Lanier BQ; Abelson MB; Berger WE; Granet DB; D'Arienzo PA; Spangler DL; Kägi MK
Clin Ther; 2002 Jul; 24(7):1161-74. PubMed ID: 12182260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study of the mast cell-stabilizing effects of treatment with olopatadine in the conjunctival allergen challenge model in humans.
Leonardi A; Abelson MB
Clin Ther; 2003 Oct; 25(10):2539-52. PubMed ID: 14667955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the effects of ketotifen fumarate 0.025% and olopatadine HCl 0.1% ophthalmic solutions in seasonal allergic conjunctivities: a 30-day, randomized, double-masked, artificial tear substitute-controlled trial.
Avunduk AM; Tekelioglu Y; Turk A; Akyol N
Clin Ther; 2005 Sep; 27(9):1392-402. PubMed ID: 16291412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and loteprednol etabonate 0.2% ophthalmic suspension in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Berdy GJ; Stoppel JO; Epstein AB
Clin Ther; 2002 Jun; 24(6):918-29. PubMed ID: 12117082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and comfort of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in the human conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Butrus S; Greiner JV; Discepola M; Finegold I
Clin Ther; 2000 Dec; 22(12):1462-72. PubMed ID: 11192137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
