These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15701943)

  • 1. Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests.
    Miller GE; Gesn PR; Rotou J
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15701943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.
    Miller GE; Rotou O; Twing JS
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15064536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between robust z and 0.3-Logit Difference procedures in assessing stability of linking items for the Rasch model.
    Huynh H; Rawls A
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 22089507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing concurrent versus fixed parameter equating with common items: using the dichotomous and partial credit models in a mixed-item format test.
    Taherbhai HM; Seo DY
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 17215567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and true-score measures of binary items as a function of their Rasch difficulty parameter.
    Dimitrov DM
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):222-33. PubMed ID: 12904673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expanding an existing multiple choice test with a mixed format test: simulation study on sample size and item recovery in concurrent calibration.
    Paek I; Young MJ
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(4):394-406. PubMed ID: 17068379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bookmark locations and item response model selection in the presence of local item dependence.
    Skaggs G
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 17215566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of data collection design, linking method, and sample size on vertical scaling using the Rasch model.
    Paek I; Young MJ; Yi Q
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(3):229-48. PubMed ID: 18753693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standard setting with dichotomous and constructed response items: some Rasch model approaches.
    MacCann RG
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):438-54. PubMed ID: 19934530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Equating and item banking with the Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(4):409-34. PubMed ID: 12077465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validating standard setting with a modified nedelsky procedure through common item test equating.
    Smith RM; Gross LJ
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 9661719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An investigation of factors affecting test equating in latent trait theory.
    Suanthong S; Schumacker RE; Beyerlein MM
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 12023556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Item parameter drift in computerized adaptive testing: Study with eCAT].
    Abad FJ; Olea J; Aguado D; Ponsoda V; Barrada JR
    Psicothema; 2010 May; 22(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 20423641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of equating methodology on reported trends in PISA.
    Gebhardt E; Adams RJ
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 17804896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An eigenvector method for estimating item parameters of the dichotomous and polytomous Rasch models.
    Garner M
    J Appl Meas; 2002; 3(2):107-28. PubMed ID: 12011497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing screening approaches to investigate stability of common items in Rasch equating.
    Arce-Ferrer AJ
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 18180550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The presence and impact of local item dependence on objective structured clinical examinations scores and the potential use of the polytomous, many-facet Rasch model.
    Lawson DM; Brailovsky C
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Oct; 29(8):651-7. PubMed ID: 17045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating the relationship between item exposure and test overlap: item sharing and item pooling.
    Chen SY; Lei PW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):205-26. PubMed ID: 19545484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binary items and beyond: a simulation of computer adaptive testing using the Rasch partial credit model.
    Lange R
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):81-104. PubMed ID: 18180552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.