BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15702210)

  • 1. Different methods to calculate effect estimates in cross-sectional studies. A comparison between prevalence odds ratio and prevalence ratio.
    Behrens T; Taeger D; Wellmann J; Keil U
    Methods Inf Med; 2004; 43(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 15702210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio.
    Barros AJ; Hirakata VN
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Oct; 3():21. PubMed ID: 14567763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Negative log-binomial model with optimal robust variance to estimate the prevalence ratio, in cross-sectional population studies.
    Ibáñez-Pinilla M; Villalba-Niño S; Olaya-Galán NN
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Oct; 23(1):219. PubMed ID: 37794385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Obtaining adjusted prevalence ratios from logistic regression models in cross-sectional studies.
    Bastos LS; Oliveira Rde V; Velasque Lde S
    Cad Saude Publica; 2015 Mar; 31(3):487-95. PubMed ID: 25859716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods for estimating prevalence ratios in cross-sectional studies.
    Coutinho LM; Scazufca M; Menezes PR
    Rev Saude Publica; 2008 Dec; 42(6):992-8. PubMed ID: 19009156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Using log-binomial model for estimating the prevalence ratio].
    Ye R; Gao YH; Yang Y; Chen Y
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2010 May; 31(5):576-8. PubMed ID: 21163041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-reported traffic density and atopic disease in children. Results of the ISAAC Phase III survey in Muenster, Germany.
    Behrens T; Taeger D; Maziak W; Duhme H; Rzehak P; Weiland SK; Keil U
    Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2004 Aug; 15(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 15305942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done?
    Thompson ML; Myers JE; Kriebel D
    Occup Environ Med; 1998 Apr; 55(4):272-7. PubMed ID: 9624282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Odds ratio or prevalence ratio? Their use in cross-sectional studies].
    Schiaffino A; Rodríguez M; Pasarín MI; Regidor E; Borrell C; Fernández E
    Gac Sanit; 2003; 17(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 12605749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complementary log-log regression for the estimation of covariate-adjusted prevalence ratios in the analysis of data from cross-sectional studies.
    Penman AD; Johnson WD
    Biom J; 2009 Jun; 51(3):433-42. PubMed ID: 19588454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the incidence rate ratio in cross-sectional studies using a simple alternative to logistic regression.
    Martuzzi M; Elliott P
    Ann Epidemiol; 1998 Jan; 8(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 9465994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of two methods for estimating prevalence ratios.
    Petersen MR; Deddens JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Feb; 8():9. PubMed ID: 18307814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between prevalence rate ratios and odds ratios in cross-sectional studies.
    Zocchetti C; Consonni D; Bertazzi PA
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997 Feb; 26(1):220-3. PubMed ID: 9126523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applied Prevalence Ratio estimation with different Regression models: An example from a cross-national study on substance use research.
    Espelt A; Marí-Dell'Olmo M; Penelo E; Bosque-Prous M
    Adicciones; 2016 Jun; 29(2):105-112. PubMed ID: 27391846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Odds ratios from logistic, geometric, Poisson, and negative binomial regression models.
    Sroka CJ; Nagaraja HN
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):112. PubMed ID: 30342488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prevalence proportion ratios: estimation and hypothesis testing.
    Skov T; Deddens J; Petersen MR; Endahl L
    Int J Epidemiol; 1998 Feb; 27(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 9563700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Logistic regression vs other generalized linear models to estimate prevalence rate ratios].
    Traissac P; Martin-Prével Y; Delpeuch F; Maire B
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Dec; 47(6):593-604. PubMed ID: 10673593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Symptoms of asthma and the home environment. The ISAAC I and III cross-sectional surveys in Münster, Germany.
    Behrens T; Maziak W; Weiland SK; Rzehak P; Siebert E; Keil U
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2005 May; 137(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 15785082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of the ISAAC questionnaire to establish the prevalence of asthma in adolescents: a population-based study.
    Lukrafka JL; Fuchs SC; Moreira LB; Picon RV; Fischer GB; Fuchs FD
    J Asthma; 2010 Mar; 47(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 20170324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prevalence of wheeze and asthma related symptoms among school children in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
    Melaku K; Berhane Y
    Ethiop Med J; 1999 Oct; 37(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 11961875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.