These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15702815)

  • 1. Importance of dosimeter calibration method on nebulizer output.
    Todd DC; Davis BE; Smycniuk AJ; Cockcroft DW
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2005 Jan; 94(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 15702815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The salt output of a nebulizer--a comparison between two nebulizer types.
    Eklund L; Sundblad BM; Malmberg P; Larsson K
    Respir Med; 2000 Feb; 94(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 10714419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calibration of aerosol output from the Mefar dosimeter: implications for epidemiological studies.
    Dennis JH; Avery AJ; Walters EH; Hendrick DJ
    Eur Respir J; 1992 Nov; 5(10):1279-82. PubMed ID: 1486976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimeter: what is the dose?
    Hargreave F
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2005 Jan; 94(1):14. PubMed ID: 15702809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro study to investigate the use of a breath-actuated, small-volume, pneumatic nebulizer for the delivery of methacholine chloride bronchoprovocation agent.
    Mitchell JP; Nagel MW; Bates SL; Doyle CC
    Respir Care; 2003 Jan; 48(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 12556261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimeter methacholine challenge: comparison of maximal versus submaximal inhalations.
    Todd DC; Davis BE; Hurst TS; Cockcroft DW
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Sep; 114(3):517-9. PubMed ID: 15356550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation in nebulizer output and weight output from Mefar dosimeter: implications for multicentre studies.
    Ward RJ; Reid DW; Walters EH
    Eur Respir J; 1997 Oct; 10(10):2436-7. PubMed ID: 9387980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the Yan and a dosimeter method for methacholine challenge in experienced and inexperienced subjects.
    Knox AJ; Wisniewski A; Cooper S; Tattersfield AE
    Eur Respir J; 1991 Apr; 4(4):497-502. PubMed ID: 1855579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variation in nebulizer aerosol output and weight output from the Mefar dosimeter: implications for multicentre studies.
    Chinn S; Arossa WA; Jarvis DL; Luczynska CM; Burney PG
    Eur Respir J; 1997 Feb; 10(2):452-6. PubMed ID: 9042648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of oscillometry as a measure of airway responsiveness in asthmatic children after histamine and methacholine bronchoprovocation with dosimeter-MedicAid and DeVilbiss nebulizers.
    Kopriva F; Szotkowská J; Plocová A; Závodská J; Zápalka M; Smatanová D; Látalová M; Slezáková L; Radová L
    J Asthma; 2007 May; 44(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 17530524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of challenge method on sensitivity, reactivity, and maximal response to methacholine.
    Prieto L; Ferrer A; Domenech J; Pérez-Francés C
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2006 Aug; 97(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16937747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of driving pressure and nebulizer model on aerosol output during intermittent delivery with a dosimeter.
    Alkins SA; Hurwitz KM; Sierra A
    J Aerosol Med; 2002; 15(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12006140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nebulizer output for methacholine challenges with the KoKo Digidoser.
    Khan YR; McDonough P; Cockcroft DW; David BE; Hendeles L
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2005 Oct; 116(4):924-6. PubMed ID: 16210072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Method of nebulizer calibration and methacholine airway responsiveness.
    Davis BE; Todd DC; Cockcroft DW
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Dec; 114(6):1474-5. PubMed ID: 15577856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standardization of methacholine inhalation challenge.
    Sekerel BE; Saraçlar Y; Tuncer A; Adalioğlu G; Cetinkaya F
    Turk J Pediatr; 1997; 39(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 9223913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two ATS recommended protocols for administration of methacholine are not equal.
    Burke RR; Obeid IM; Williams LK; Morris ZQ
    J Asthma; 2009 Sep; 46(7):740-4. PubMed ID: 19728216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of volume output from two different continuous nebulizer systems.
    Reisner C; Lee J; Kotch A; Dworkin G
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1996 Feb; 76(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 8595543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Agreement between tracheal auscultation and pulmonary function in methacholine bronchial inhalation challenge in asthmatic children].
    de Frutos Martínez C; González Pérez-Yarza E; Aldasoro Ruiz A; Emparanza Knörr JI; Callén Blecua M; Mintegui Aramburu J
    An Esp Pediatr; 2002 Apr; 56(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 11927097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developing alternative delivery systems for methacholine challenge tests.
    Coates AL; Leung K; Dell SD
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2014 Feb; 27(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23586502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Importance of evaporative water losses during standardized nebulized inhalation provocation tests.
    Cockcroft DW; Hurst TS; Gore BP
    Chest; 1989 Sep; 96(3):505-8. PubMed ID: 2486186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.