240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15703148)
21. Hearing protector performance--an update.
Michael PL; Bienvenue GR
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Aug; 41(8):542-6. PubMed ID: 7405821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Noise attenuation of hearing protectors against heavy weapon noise.
Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K; Savolainen S; Myllyniemi J; Hämäläinen E
Mil Med; 2000 Sep; 165(9):678-82. PubMed ID: 11011540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Relative ear protector performance in high vs low sound levels.
Thunder TD; Lankford JE
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Dec; 40(12):1023-9. PubMed ID: 539542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hearing protection works!
Rink TL
Occup Health Saf; 1996 Oct; 65(10):58-64. PubMed ID: 8865670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Methods of measuring and rating hearing protector performance.
Lotito F
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Oct; 37(10):590-5. PubMed ID: 983949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ear protectors vs. intense impact noise.
Sataloff J; Sataloff RT
Occup Health Saf; 1983 Aug; 52(8):25, 28. PubMed ID: 6621966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Study on effects of combined hearing protector on communication quality and noise protection].
Li D; Zheng S; He Y
Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 1997 Oct; 10(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 11540394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Ear protective plugs].
Sułkowski W; Kowalska S; Kieruczenko J; Krezelewska E; Sławiński Z; Wośko S
Med Pr; 1979; 30(3):221-4. PubMed ID: 481203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Noise exposure, awareness, attitudes and use of hearing protection in a steel rolling mill in Nigeria.
Ologe FE; Akande TM; Olajide TG
Occup Med (Lond); 2005 Sep; 55(6):487-9. PubMed ID: 15845553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Innovative field practices in hearing conservation.
Witt B
Occup Health Saf; 2006 Oct; 75(10):116, 118-9, 172. PubMed ID: 17059061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Noise monitoring and establishment of a comprehensive hearing conservation program.
Randolph MM; Hill WA; Randolph BW
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2007 Jan; 46(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 17203915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The objective measurement of individual earplug field performance.
Voix J; Laville F
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3722-32. PubMed ID: 19507954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Field investigations of noise reduction afforded by insert-type hearing protectors.
Lempert BL; Edwards RG
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Dec; 44(12):894-902. PubMed ID: 6660189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effects of training format on earplug performance.
Joseph A; Punch J; Stephenson M; Paneth N; Wolfe E; Murphy W
Int J Audiol; 2007 Oct; 46(10):609-18. PubMed ID: 17922350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube.
Murphy WJ; Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Shaw PB; Stergar M
Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):364-73. PubMed ID: 26356380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. No more guesswork. At last, hearing protectors can be fit tested!
Seidemann M
Occup Health Saf; 2001 Sep; 70(9):130-2. PubMed ID: 11582685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Hearing protectors: topicality and research needs.
Canetto P
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 19534847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers.
Davies H; Marion S; Teschke K
Am J Ind Med; 2008 Dec; 51(12):923-31. PubMed ID: 18726988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A proposal for a more refined single number rating system for hearing protector attenuation specification.
Williams W
Noise Health; 2012; 14(59):210-4. PubMed ID: 22918152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ear muffs: a field guide.
Sokol B
Occup Health Saf; 2005 Jun; 74(6):66, 68, 138. PubMed ID: 16047972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
