BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15704655)

  • 1. Influence of occlusal height for an implant prosthesis on the periodontal tissues of the antagonist.
    Hoshino K; Miura H; Morikawa O; Kato H; Okada D; Shinki T
    J Med Dent Sci; 2004 Dec; 51(4):187-96. PubMed ID: 15704655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distribution of occlusal forces during occlusal adjustment of dental implant prostheses: a nonlinear finite element analysis considering the capacity for displacement of opposing teeth and implants.
    Kasai K; Takayama Y; Yokoyama A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 22442771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants.
    Tawil G; Aboujaoude N; Younan R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 16634499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo vertical forces on implants.
    Richter EJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 7615323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces.
    Lin CL; Wang JC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 12814307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Control of jaw closing forces: a comparison between natural tooth and osseointegrated implant.
    Leung T; Lai VF
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2000 Sep; 8(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 11307564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. part 4: a histologic study in monkeys.
    Miyata T; Kobayashi Y; Araki H; Ohto T; Shin K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 12074454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occlusal forces and chewing ability in dentitions with cross-arch bridges.
    Laurell L
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1985; 26():160p.. PubMed ID: 3901379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of occlusal contacts on adjacent tooth.
    Ikeda A; Miura H; Okada D; Tokuda A; Shinogaya T
    J Med Dent Sci; 2005 Dec; 52(4):195-202. PubMed ID: 16669453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum clenching force of patients with moderate loss of posterior tooth support: a pilot study.
    Gibbs CH; Anusavice KJ; Young HM; Jones JS; Esquivel-Upshaw JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 12473999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphofunctional aspects of dental implants.
    Meyer G; Fanghänel J; Proff P
    Ann Anat; 2012 Mar; 194(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 22137145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
    Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical interactions of an implant/tooth-supported system under different periodontal supports and number of splinted teeth with rigid and non-rigid connections.
    Lin CL; Chang SH; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    J Dent; 2006 Oct; 34(9):682-91. PubMed ID: 16439048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in masticatory function in patients with endodontically treated teeth and single-implant-supported prostheses: a pilot study.
    Woodmansey KF; Ayik M; Buschang PH; White CA; He J
    J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 19084116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electromyographic analysis of masticatory and neck muscles in subjects with natural dentition, teeth-supported and implant-supported prostheses.
    Tartaglia GM; Testori T; Pallavera A; Marelli B; Sforza C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1081-8. PubMed ID: 18828826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of clenching level on mandibular displacement in Kennedy Class II partially edentulous patients.
    Yamazaki M; Yugami K; Baba K; Ohyama T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 12737252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of bone around a dental implant supporting a crown with a premature contact.
    Chaichanasiri E; Nanakorn P; Tharanon W; Sloten JV
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Oct; 92(10):1336-44. PubMed ID: 19845242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation of tooth/implant-supported fixed prosthesis designs with two different stress analysis methods: an in vitro study.
    Ozçelik T; Ersoy AE
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 17362420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.