175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15705077)
1. Prostate cancer detection with digital rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen, transrectal ultrasonography and biopsy in clinical urological practice.
Ng TK; Vasilareas D; Mitterdorfer AJ; Maher PO; Lalak A
BJU Int; 2005 Mar; 95(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 15705077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is a digital rectal examination necessary in the diagnosis and clinical staging of early prostate cancer?
Philip J; Dutta Roy S; Ballal M; Foster CS; Javlé P
BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):969-71. PubMed ID: 15839915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A multicenter study on the detection of prostate cancer by digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen in men with or without urinary symptoms. Cooperative Group for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.
Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 9286642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of transperineal six-core prostate biopsy in patients with prostate-specific antigen level greater than 10 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination findings.
Luciani LG; De Giorgi G; Valotto C; Zanin M; Bierti S; Zattoni F
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):555-8. PubMed ID: 16527579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening for prostate cancer.
Pode D; Shapiro A; Lebensart P; Meretyk S; Katz G; Barak V
Isr J Med Sci; 1995; 31(2-3):125-8. PubMed ID: 7538101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate cancer in patients with an abnormal digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen less than 4.0 ng/mL.
Bozeman CB; Carver BS; Caldito G; Venable DD; Eastham JA
Urology; 2005 Oct; 66(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 16230142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The incidence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical glands suspicious for carcinoma on first-time saturation needle biopsy, and the subsequent risk of cancer.
Schoenfield L; Jones JS; Zippe CD; Reuther AM; Klein E; Zhou M; Magi-Galluzzi C
BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):770-4. PubMed ID: 17233800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of the digital rectal examination in subsequent screening visits in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.
Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; Schröder FH
Eur Urol; 2008 Sep; 54(3):581-8. PubMed ID: 18423977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of prostate cancer on extended biopsy in patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a multivariate analysis model.
Abdel-Khalek M; El-Baz M; Ibrahiem el-H
BJU Int; 2004 Sep; 94(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 15329106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Volume-adjusted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) variables in detecting impalpable prostate cancer in men with PSA levels of 2-4 ng/mL: transabdominal measurement makes a significant contribution.
Kobayashi T; Kawahara T; Nishizawa K; Ogura K; Mitsumori K; Ide Y
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1245-8. PubMed ID: 15892809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variation in patterns of practice in diagnosing screen-detected prostate cancer.
Nam RK; Toi A; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Klotz L; Fleshner N; Bagnell PS; Sweet J; Sugar L; Narod SA
BJU Int; 2004 Dec; 94(9):1239-44. PubMed ID: 15610097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital rectal examination as a prostate cancer-screening method in a country with a low incidence of prostate cancer.
Shim HB; Lee SE; Park HK; Ku JH
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2007; 10(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 17297501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An abnormal digital rectal examination is an independent predictor of Gleason > or =7 prostate cancer in men undergoing initial prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 790 men.
Borden LS; Wright JL; Kim J; Latchamsetty K; Porter CR
BJU Int; 2007 Mar; 99(3):559-63. PubMed ID: 17155976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in early detection of prostate cancer.
Galić J; Karner I; Cenan L; Tucak A; Hegedus I; Pasini J; Bilandzija-Peranović M; Mihaljević S
Coll Antropol; 2003; 27 Suppl 1():61-6. PubMed ID: 12955893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate cancer risk with positive family history, normal prostate examination findings, and PSA less than 4.0 ng/mL.
Canby-Hagino E; Hernandez J; Brand TC; Troyer DA; Higgins B; Ankerst DP; Thompson IM; Leach RJ; Parekh DJ
Urology; 2007 Oct; 70(4):748-52. PubMed ID: 17991549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The electromagnetic detection of prostatic cancer: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.
Tubaro A; De Nunzio C; Trucchi A; Stoppacciaro A; Miano L
Urology; 2008 Aug; 72(2):340-4. PubMed ID: 18336888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeat prostate biopsy in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial.
Pinsky PF; Crawford ED; Kramer BS; Andriole GL; Gelmann EP; Grubb R; Greenlee R; Gohagan JK
BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 17223921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The detection rate of prostate cancer in different prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in Chinese men].
Li M; Na YQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 88(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 18346372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection rate of prostate cancer according to prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in Korean men: a nationwide multicenter study.
Seo HK; Chung MK; Ryu SB; Lee KH;
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1109-12. PubMed ID: 18158028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Saturation technique does not decrease cancer detection during followup after initial prostate biopsy.
Lane BR; Zippe CD; Abouassaly R; Schoenfield L; Magi-Galluzzi C; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1746-50; discussion 1750. PubMed ID: 18343412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
