1770 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15705192)
1. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Leveraging two-way probe-level block design for identifying differential gene expression with high-density oligonucleotide arrays.
Barrera L; Benner C; Tao YC; Winzeler E; Zhou Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 5():42. PubMed ID: 15099405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design and evaluation of Actichip, a thematic microarray for the study of the actin cytoskeleton.
Muller J; Mehlen A; Vetter G; Yatskou M; Muller A; Chalmel F; Poch O; Friederich E; Vallar L
BMC Genomics; 2007 Aug; 8():294. PubMed ID: 17727702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can Zipf's law be adapted to normalize microarrays?
Lu T; Costello CM; Croucher PJ; Häsler R; Deuschl G; Schreiber S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():37. PubMed ID: 15727680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detecting differentially expressed genes by relative entropy.
Yan X; Deng M; Fung WK; Qian M
J Theor Biol; 2005 Jun; 234(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 15784273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
Datta S; Datta S
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robust estimation of the false discovery rate.
Pounds S; Cheng C
Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(16):1979-87. PubMed ID: 16777905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of missing value imputation on detection of differentially expressed genes from microarray data.
Scheel I; Aldrin M; Glad IK; Sørum R; Lyng H; Frigessi A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4272-9. PubMed ID: 16216830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new outlier removal approach for cDNA microarray normalization.
Wu Y; Yan L; Liu H; Sun H; Xie H
Biotechniques; 2009 Aug; 47(2):691-2, 694-700. PubMed ID: 19737130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robustified MANOVA with applications in detecting differentially expressed genes from oligonucleotide arrays.
Xu J; Cui X
Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 24(8):1056-62. PubMed ID: 18316342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA microarray data imputation and significance analysis of differential expression.
Jörnsten R; Wang HY; Welsh WJ; Ouyang M
Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4155-61. PubMed ID: 16118262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gene expression and isoform variation analysis using Affymetrix Exon Arrays.
Bemmo A; Benovoy D; Kwan T; Gaffney DJ; Jensen RV; Majewski J
BMC Genomics; 2008 Nov; 9():529. PubMed ID: 18990248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the identification of differentially expressed genes: improving the generalized F-statistics for Affymetrix microarray gene expression data.
Lai Y
Comput Biol Chem; 2006 Oct; 30(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 16979381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calibration of microarray gene-expression data.
Binder H; Preibisch S; Berger H
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 576():375-407. PubMed ID: 19882273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Murthy KR; Michiels S; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3865-72. PubMed ID: 16105901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microarray data analysis: a hierarchical T-test to handle heteroscedasticity.
de Menezes RX; Boer JM; van Houwelingen HC
Appl Bioinformatics; 2004; 3(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 15702953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis.
Jung SH
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
