These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1773 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15705192)

  • 21. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new summarization method for Affymetrix probe level data.
    Hochreiter S; Clevert DA; Obermayer K
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 16473874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long versus short oligonucleotide microarrays for the study of gene expression in nonhuman primates.
    Walker SJ; Wang Y; Grant KA; Chan F; Hellmann GM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Apr; 152(1-2):179-89. PubMed ID: 16253343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improved statistical tests for differential gene expression by shrinking variance components estimates.
    Cui X; Hwang JT; Qiu J; Blades NJ; Churchill GA
    Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 15618528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modeling nonlinearity in dilution design microarray data.
    Zheng X; Huang HC; Li W; Liu P; Li QZ; Liu Y
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; 23(11):1339-47. PubMed ID: 17237040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Statistical analysis of an RNA titration series evaluates microarray precision and sensitivity on a whole-array basis.
    Holloway AJ; Oshlack A; Diyagama DS; Bowtell DD; Smyth GK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 7():511. PubMed ID: 17118209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Selection and validation of normalization methods for c-DNA microarrays using within-array replications.
    Fan J; Niu Y
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(18):2391-8. PubMed ID: 17660210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Statistical analysis of global gene expression data: some practical considerations.
    Holzman T; Kolker E
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2004 Feb; 15(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 15102467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ranking analysis for identifying differentially expressed genes.
    Qi Y; Sun H; Sun Q; Pan L
    Genomics; 2011 May; 97(5):326-9. PubMed ID: 21402142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gene expression analysis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using gene set enrichment analysis for biostatistical management.
    Maruschke M; Reuter D; Koczan D; Hakenberg OW; Thiesen HJ
    BJU Int; 2011 Jul; 108(2 Pt 2):E29-35. PubMed ID: 21435154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Meta-analysis of cancer gene-profiling data.
    Yang X; Sun X
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 576():409-26. PubMed ID: 19882274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing three methods for variance estimation with duplicated high density oligonucleotide arrays.
    Huang X; Pan W
    Funct Integr Genomics; 2002 Aug; 2(3):126-33. PubMed ID: 12185460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
    Gao X
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
    Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of a statistical equivalence test applied to microarray data.
    Qiu J; Cui X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):240-66. PubMed ID: 20309757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detecting differential gene expression with a semiparametric hierarchical mixture method.
    Newton MA; Noueiry A; Sarkar D; Ahlquist P
    Biostatistics; 2004 Apr; 5(2):155-76. PubMed ID: 15054023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. twilight; a Bioconductor package for estimating the local false discovery rate.
    Scheid S; Spang R
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(12):2921-2. PubMed ID: 15817688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Degrees of differential gene expression: detecting biologically significant expression differences and estimating their magnitudes.
    Bickel DR
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Mar; 20(5):682-8. PubMed ID: 15033875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of methods for oligonucleotide array data via quantitative real-time PCR.
    Qin LX; Beyer RP; Hudson FN; Linford NJ; Morris DE; Kerr KF
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 7():23. PubMed ID: 16417622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 89.