These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
28. Clinical evaluation of indirect resin composite and ceramic onlays over a 24-month period. Kaytan B; Onal B; Pamir T; Tezel H Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 16252535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Three-year clinical follow-up of posterior teeth restored with leucite-reinforced ips empress onlays and partial veneer crowns. Murgueitio R; Bernal G J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 22372380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Molin MK; Karlsson SL Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after 12 years. Frankenberger R; Taschner M; Garcia-Godoy F; Petschelt A; Krämer N J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 19058686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite. de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces. Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin-enamel-bonded pressed ceramic coverages. van Dijken JW; Hasselrot L Dent Mater; 2010 Sep; 26(9):929-39. PubMed ID: 20691334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Longevity and clinical performance of IPS-Empress ceramic restorations--a literature review. El-Mowafy O; Brochu JF J Can Dent Assoc; 2002 Apr; 68(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 12626277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays. Peumans M; Voet M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Van Ende A; Van Meerbeek B Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Apr; 17(3):739-50. PubMed ID: 22707232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. IPS Empress onlays luted with two dual-cured resin cements for endodontically treated teeth: a 3-year clinical evaluation. Atali PY; Cakmakcioglu O; Topbasi B; Turkmen C; Suslen O Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 21210001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers. Guess PC; Stappert CF Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):804-13. PubMed ID: 18006051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro evaluation of fit of adhesively luted ceramic inlays. Audenino G; Bresciano ME; Bassi F; Carossa S Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 10635204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]