BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15706142)

  • 1. Validating an important aspect of the new ICRP biokinetic model of thorium.
    Roth P; Höllriegl V; Li WB; Oeh U; Schramel P
    Health Phys; 2005 Mar; 88(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 15706142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of observed lung retention and urinary excretion of thorium workers and members of the public in India with the values predicted by the ICRP biokinetic model.
    Jaiswal DD; Singh IS; Nair S; Dang HS; Garg SP; Pradhan AS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(2):237-43. PubMed ID: 15292523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can default ICRP f1 values be applied to determine radiation dose from the intake of diet-incorporated thorium?
    Höllriegl V; Li WB; Oeh U; Röhmuss M; Roth P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 15797920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biokinetic modelling of natural thorium in humans by ingestion.
    Li WB; Wahl W; Oeh U; Höllriegl V; Roth P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):500-5. PubMed ID: 17337738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observation of changes in urinary excretion of thorium in humans following ingestion of a therapeutic soil.
    Höllriegl V; Greiter M; Giussani A; Gerstmann U; Michalke B; Roth P; Oeh U
    J Environ Radioact; 2007; 95(2-3):149-60. PubMed ID: 17400343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Concentration and daily excretion of uranium in urine of Japanese.
    Tolmachev S; Kuwabara J; Noguchi H
    Health Phys; 2006 Aug; 91(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 16832195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A modified ICRP 66 iodine gas uptake model and its parametric uncertainty.
    Harvey RP; Hamby DM; Palmer TS;
    Health Phys; 2004 Nov; 87(5):490-506. PubMed ID: 15551787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thorium and uranium contents in human urine: influence of age and residential area.
    Al-Jundi J; Werner E; Roth P; Höllriegl V; Wendler I; Schramel P
    J Environ Radioact; 2004; 71(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 14557037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
    Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF
    Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of the ICRP's dose coefficients for members of the public. III. Plutonium as a case study of uncertainties in the systemic biokinetics of radionuclides.
    Leggett RW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(2):103-20. PubMed ID: 14653331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of ICP-MS for the assessment of thorium excretion in urine.
    Roth P; Werner E; Wendler I; Schramel P
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1996; 47(9-10):1055-6. PubMed ID: 8976047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementation of bioassay methods to improve assessment of incorporated radionuclides.
    Oeh U; Andrasi A; Bouvier-Capely C; De Carlan L; Fischer H; Franck D; Höllriegl V; Li WB; Ritt J; Roth P; Schmitzer Ch; Wahl W; Zombori P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):444-8. PubMed ID: 17309876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biokinetic models for the behaviour of carbon-14 from labelled compounds in the human body: can a single generic model be justified?
    Taylor DM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(3):187-202. PubMed ID: 15031441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetric assessment from 212Pb inhalation at a thorium purification plant.
    Campos MP; Pecequilo BR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):323-6. PubMed ID: 15266077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. UK laboratory intercomparison on internal dosimetry.
    Speed J; Birchall A; Bull R; Cockerill R; Jarvis NS; Marsh JW; Peace MS; Roberts G; Scarlett C; Spencer D; Stewart P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 14565728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons of 239Pu inhalation doses calculated with ICRP 67 and proposed systemic models.
    Li WB; Oeh U; Paretzke HG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):148-52. PubMed ID: 17545662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Internal dose assessment of natural uranium from drinking water based on biokinetic modeling and individual bioassay monitoring: a study of a Finnish family.
    Li WB; Salonen L; Muikku M; Wahl W; Höllriegl V; Oeh U; Roth P; Rahola T
    Health Phys; 2006 Jun; 90(6):533-43. PubMed ID: 16691101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weighting factors for radiation quality: how to unite the two current concepts.
    Kellerer AM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):781-7. PubMed ID: 15353747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Basis and implications of the ICRP's new biokinetic model for thorium. International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Leggett RW
    Health Phys; 1997 Oct; 73(4):587-600. PubMed ID: 9314218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uranium and thorium in urine of United States residents: reference range concentrations.
    Ting BG; Paschal DC; Jarrett JM; Pirkle JL; Jackson RJ; Sampson EJ; Miller DT; Caudill SP
    Environ Res; 1999 Jul; 81(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 10361025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.