188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1570619)
1. Groshong versus Hickman catheters.
Pasquale MD; Campbell JM; Magnant CM
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 May; 174(5):408-10. PubMed ID: 1570619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Externalized Groshong catheters and Hickman ports for central venous access in gynecologic oncology patients.
Gleeson NC; Fiorica JV; Mark JE; Pinelli DM; Hoffman MS; Roberts WS; Cavanagh D
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Dec; 51(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 8112648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized, prospective trial of standard Hickman compared with Groshong central venous catheters in pediatric oncology patients.
Warner BW; Haygood MM; Davies SL; Hennies GA
J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Aug; 183(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 8696545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nurse and patient satisfaction with three types of venous access devices.
Dearborn P; De Muth JS; Requarth AB; Ward SE
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1997; 24(1 Suppl):34-40. PubMed ID: 9010863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Long term central venous catheterization revisited].
Palermo S; Campolucci A; Capozza F; Cammardella MP; Balestrero A; Ferrando F; Basta P; Launo C
Minerva Anestesiol; 1995 Nov; 61(11):451-6. PubMed ID: 8677035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The timing and sequence of multiple device-related complications in patients with long-term indwelling Groshong catheters.
Tolar B; Gould JR
Cancer; 1996 Sep; 78(6):1308-13. PubMed ID: 8826955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safe techniques for inserting the hickman catheter in pediatric patients.
Masumoto K; Uesugi T; Nagata K; Takada N; Taguchi S; Ogita K; Yamanouchi T; Taguchi T; Suita S
Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2006; 23(7):531-40. PubMed ID: 16928648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External jugular Groshong catheter is associated with fewer complications than a subclavian Argyle catheter.
Ishizuka M; Nagata H; Takagi K; Horie T; Furihata M; Nakagawa A; Kubota K
Eur Surg Res; 2008; 40(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 17998779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Thrombotic complications of silicone rubber catheters during autologous marrow and peripheral stem cell transplantation: prospective comparison of Hickman and Groshong catheters.
Haire WD; Lieberman RP; Lund GB; Edney JA; Kessinger A; Armitage JO
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1991 Jan; 7(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 1675136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Infectious and non-infectious complications of tunneled central catheters in hematologic patients].
Albo López C; López Rodríguez D; Constenla Camba MI; Jimenéz Blanco A; Araujo LF; García-Medina J
Sangre (Barc); 1999 Jun; 44(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 10481577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prolonged venous access in cancer patients.
Guenier C; Ferreira J; Pector JC
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1989 Dec; 15(6):553-5. PubMed ID: 2599125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Insertion of Groshong central venous catheters utilizing fluoroscopic techniques.
Burnett AF; Lossef SV; Barth KH; Grendys EC; Johnson JC; Barter JF; Barnes WA
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jan; 52(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 8307504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Hickman catheter for long-term parenteral therapy. A prospective interdisciplinary study].
Lang W; Schweiger H; Richter U; Richter R; Beck JD; Krasa M; Luthin D
Med Klin (Munich); 1992 Aug; 87(8):412-7. PubMed ID: 1406473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Insertion of Hickman catheters by the percutaneous technique.
Teh A; Leong KW
Med J Malaysia; 1995 Dec; 50(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 8668056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Malpositioning of Hickman catheters, left versus right sided attempts.
Unal AE; Bayar S; Arat M; Ilhan O
Transfus Apher Sci; 2003 Feb; 28(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 12620263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparisons of outcomes and survivals for two central venous access port systems.
Hou SM; Wang PC; Sung YC; Lee HH; Liu HT; Chen YH
J Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul; 91(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 15999349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Complications of central venous catheterization in hematologic patients--prospective study of 193 catheterizations].
Faber E; Mociková K; Grochal B; Koróny S; Matecek L
Vnitr Lek; 1994 Dec; 40(12):765-9. PubMed ID: 7839628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A
Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of cuffed tunneled hemodialysis catheter survival.
Rocklin MA; Dwight CA; Callen LJ; Bispham BZ; Spiegel DM
Am J Kidney Dis; 2001 Mar; 37(3):557-63. PubMed ID: 11228180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complications associated with central venous catheters in a haematology unit.
Sharpe PC; Morris TC
Ulster Med J; 1994 Oct; 63(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 8650826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
