These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15706723)

  • 21. Privacy issues for girls are in the news and in BJN.
    Foss TD
    Br J Nurs; 2006 Jan 26-Feb 8; 15(2):65. PubMed ID: 16493277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Parent versus child: H.L. v. Matheson and the new abortion litigation.
    Bridge B
    Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(1):75-116. PubMed ID: 11655605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Parental notification as a prerequisite for minors' access to contraceptives: a behavioral and legal analysis.
    Finger MN
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1979; 13(1):196-223. PubMed ID: 11665130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The law and legal impact of contraceptive use by minors in North Carolina.
    Wright DM
    North Carol Centr Law J; 1975; 6(2):304-13. PubMed ID: 11664471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lesbians and abortion.
    Robson R
    Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):247-79. PubMed ID: 21774157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Splitting the baby: when can a pregnant minor obtain an abortion without parental consent? The Ex parte Anonymous cases (Alabama 2001).
    Rosenberg SP
    Conn Law Rev; 2002; 34(3):1109-41. PubMed ID: 15212029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases.
    Ehrlich JS
    Mich J Gend Law; 2000; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Parental notification: is it settled?
    Donovan P
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(5):243-6. PubMed ID: 7286175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lochner redeemed: family privacy after Troxel and Carhart.
    Meyer DD
    UCLA Law Rev; 2001 Jun; 48(5):1125-90. PubMed ID: 16273684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
    Bertuglia J
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minor consent in birth control and abortion: Part 1.
    Trandel-Korenchuk D; Trandel-Korenchuk K
    Nurse Pract; 1980; 5(2):47, 50-1, 54. PubMed ID: 7360418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The husband's rights in abortion.
    Etzioni A
    Trial; 1976 Nov; 12(11):56-8. PubMed ID: 11664680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Feminist theory confronts US Supreme Court rhetoric: the case of abortion rights.
    Binion G
    Int J Law Policy Family; 1997; 11(1):63-85. PubMed ID: 16848074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Constitutional law--Supreme Court is undecided on parental notification requirement for minor's abortion.
    McArthur JR
    S C Law Rev; 1980 Feb; 31(3):604-16. PubMed ID: 11665169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Public reason and political conflict: abortion and homosexuality.
    George RP
    Yale Law J; 1997 Jun; 106(8):2475-504. PubMed ID: 12569946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Another abortion decision coming up.
    Origins; 1979 Jan; 8(32):510-2. PubMed ID: 11665075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization.
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The next abortion decision.
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A34. PubMed ID: 16450474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked.
    Lucas R
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.