These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15707175)

  • 1. Colorectal cancer screening in Australia: an economic evaluation of a potential biennial screening program using faecal occult blood tests.
    Stone CA; Carter RC; Vos T; John JS
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2004 Jun; 28(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 15707175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prostate cancer, the PSA test and academic detailing in Australian general practice: an economic evaluation.
    Stone CA; May FW; Pinnock CB; Elwood M; Rowett DS
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2005 Aug; 29(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 16222933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Costs and cost-effectiveness of full implementation of a biennial faecal occult blood test screening program for bowel cancer in Australia.
    Pignone MP; Flitcroft KL; Howard K; Trevena LJ; Salkeld GP; St John DJ
    Med J Aust; 2011 Feb; 194(4):180-5. PubMed ID: 21401458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening by faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer in Australia.
    Salkeld G; Young G; Irwig L; Haas M; Glasziou P
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1996 Apr; 20(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 8799087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term evaluation of benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia: a modelling study.
    Lew JB; St John DJB; Xu XM; Greuter MJE; Caruana M; Cenin DR; He E; Saville M; Grogan P; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
    Lancet Public Health; 2017 Jul; 2(7):e331-e340. PubMed ID: 29253458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening: comparison of community-based flexible sigmoidoscopy with fecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy.
    O'Leary BA; Olynyk JK; Neville AM; Platell CF
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Jan; 19(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 14675241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of potential alternatives to iFOBT testing for colorectal cancer screening in Australia.
    Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Sarfati D; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
    Int J Cancer; 2018 Jul; 143(2):269-282. PubMed ID: 29441568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Inadomi JM
    Ann Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 133(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 11033584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer.
    Lejeune C; Arveux P; Dancourt V; Béjean S; Bonithon-Kopp C; Faivre J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2004; 20(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 15609792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, hemoccult.
    Towler BP; Irwig L; Glasziou P; Weller D; Kewenter J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD001216. PubMed ID: 10796760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential impact of population-based colorectal cancer screening in Canada.
    Flanagan WM; Le Petit C; Berthelot JM; White KJ; Coombs BA; Jones-McLean E
    Chronic Dis Can; 2003; 24(4):81-8. PubMed ID: 14733756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of the faecal immunochemical test at a range of positivity thresholds compared with the guaiac faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.
    Murphy J; Halloran S; Gray A
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017186. PubMed ID: 29079605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Limitations of the faecal occult blood test in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Delcò F; Sonnenberg A
    Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1999 Mar; 31(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10363196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: time to achieve its potential to save lives.
    Ee H; St John J
    Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Program: the early years.
    Rees CJ; Bevan R
    Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Jul; 7(5):421-37. PubMed ID: 23899282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness and economic impact of screening for colorectal cancer by mass fecal occult blood testing.
    Helm JF; Russo MW; Biddle AK; Simpson KN; Ransohoff DF; Sandler RS
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Nov; 95(11):3250-8. PubMed ID: 11095350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening for colorectal cancer using the fecal occult blood test: an actuarial assessment of the impact of a population-based screening program in Canada.
    Villeneuve PJ; Coombs A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2003; 19(4):715-23. PubMed ID: 15095779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness simulation and analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong Chinese population: comparison amongst colonoscopy, guaiac and immunologic fecal occult blood testing.
    Wong CK; Lam CL; Wan YF; Fong DY
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15():705. PubMed ID: 26471036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recommendations on population screening for colorectal cancer in New Zealand. Members of the National Health Committee Working Party on Population Screening for Colorectal Cancer.
    N Z Med J; 1999 Jan; 112(1080):4-6. PubMed ID: 10073156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.