These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15707480)
1. The case for well-conducted experiments to validate statistical protocols for 2D gels: different pre-processing = different lists of significant proteins. Meleth S; Deshane J; Kim H BMC Biotechnol; 2005 Feb; 5():7. PubMed ID: 15707480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new method for 2D gel spot alignment: application to the analysis of large sample sets in clinical proteomics. Pérès S; Molina L; Salvetat N; Granier C; Molina F BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():460. PubMed ID: 18957120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Alternative experimental design with an applied normalization scheme can improve statistical power in 2D-DIGE experiments. Engelen K; Sifrim A; Van de Plas B; Laukens K; Arckens L; Marchal K J Proteome Res; 2010 Oct; 9(10):4919-26. PubMed ID: 20681517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How do shotgun proteomics algorithms identify proteins? Marcotte EM Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jul; 25(7):755-7. PubMed ID: 17621303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sub-proteome differential display: single gel comparison by 2D electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Spandidos A; Rabbitts TH J Mol Biol; 2002 Apr; 318(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12054765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of proteomics in cancer gene profiling: two-dimensional difference in gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE). Hariharan D; Weeks ME; Crnogorac-Jurcevic T Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 576():197-211. PubMed ID: 19882264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical challenges in the analysis of two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis experiments using DeCyder. Fodor IK; Nelson DO; Alegria-Hartman M; Robbins K; Langlois RG; Turteltaub KW; Corzett TH; McCutchen-Maloney SL Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(19):3733-40. PubMed ID: 16091413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feature selection and nearest centroid classification for protein mass spectrometry. Levner I BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():68. PubMed ID: 15788095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. All about DIGE: quantification technology for differential-display 2D-gel proteomics. Lilley KS; Friedman DB Expert Rev Proteomics; 2004 Dec; 1(4):401-9. PubMed ID: 15966837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-Gel 18O labeling for improved identification of proteins from 2-DE Gel spots in comparative proteomic experiments. Broedel O; Krause E; Stephanowitz H; Schuemann M; Eravci M; Weist S; Brunkau C; Wittke J; Eravci S; Baumgartner A J Proteome Res; 2009 Jul; 8(7):3771-7. PubMed ID: 19425618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 2D gel-based Proteomics: there's life in the old dog yet. Westermeier R Arch Physiol Biochem; 2016 Dec; 122(5):236-237. PubMed ID: 27089245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in the spatial and quantitative reproducibility between two second-dimensional gel electrophoresis systems. Zhan X; Desiderio DM Electrophoresis; 2003 Jun; 24(11):1834-46. PubMed ID: 12783460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disease proteomics of high-molecular-mass proteins by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis with agarose gels in the first dimension (Agarose 2-DE). Oh-Ishi M; Maeda T J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2007 Apr; 849(1-2):211-22. PubMed ID: 17141588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Geometrical distortions in two-dimensional gels: applicable correction methods. Aittokallio T; Salmi J; Nyman TA; Nevalainen OS J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2005 Feb; 815(1-2):25-37. PubMed ID: 15652796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. STEM: a software tool for large-scale proteomic data analyses. Shinkawa T; Taoka M; Yamauchi Y; Ichimura T; Kaji H; Takahashi N; Isobe T J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(5):1826-31. PubMed ID: 16212438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]