254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15707628)
1. Comparison of Enterococcus measurements in freshwater at two recreational beaches by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and membrane filter culture analysis.
Haugland RA; Siefring SC; Wymer LJ; Brenner KP; Dufour AP
Water Res; 2005 Feb; 39(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 15707628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Enterococcus density estimates in marine beach and bay samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction, membrane filtration and defined substrate testing.
Ferretti JA; Tran HV; Cosgrove E; Protonentis J; Loftin V; Conklin CS; Grant RN
Mar Pollut Bull; 2011 May; 62(5):1066-72. PubMed ID: 21440266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modeling Enterococcus densities measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and membrane filtration using environmental conditions at four Great Lakes beaches.
Telech JW; Brenner KP; Haugland R; Sams E; Dufour AP; Wymer L; Wade TJ
Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4947-55. PubMed ID: 19651425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship and variation of qPCR and culturable Enterococci estimates in ambient surface waters are predictable.
Whitman RL; Ge Z; Nevers MB; Boehm AB; Chern EC; Haugland RA; Lukasik AM; Molina M; Przybyla-Kelly K; Shively DA; White EM; Zepp RG; Byappanahalli MN
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 44(13):5049-54. PubMed ID: 20527919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linking non-culturable (qPCR) and culturable enterococci densities with hydrometeorological conditions.
Byappanahalli MN; Whitman RL; Shively DA; Nevers MB
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Jul; 408(16):3096-101. PubMed ID: 20546850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid QPCR-based assay for fecal Bacteroides spp. as a tool for assessing fecal contamination in recreational waters.
Converse RR; Blackwood AD; Kirs M; Griffith JF; Noble RT
Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4828-37. PubMed ID: 19631958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification of enterococci and bifidobacteria in Georgia estuaries using conventional and molecular methods.
Morrison CR; Bachoon DS; Gates KW
Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):4001-9. PubMed ID: 18708238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid monitoring of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. in bathing water using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR.
Bergeron P; Oujati H; Catalán Cuenca V; Huguet Mestre JM; Courtois S
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2011 Nov; 214(6):478-84. PubMed ID: 21917514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A cross comparison of QPCR to agar-based or defined substrate test methods for the determination of Escherichia coli and enterococci in municipal water quality monitoring programs.
Lavender JS; Kinzelman JL
Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4967-79. PubMed ID: 19717179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the enterococci indicator in biosolids using culture-based and quantitative PCR assays.
Viau E; Peccia J
Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4878-87. PubMed ID: 19781735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Detection of enteric pathogenic bacteria from surface waters by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR)].
Liu YJ; Zhang CM; Wang XC; Lü YJ; Zuo LL
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2008 May; 29(5):1175-80. PubMed ID: 18624175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid method demonstration project at four New Jersey marine beaches using real time quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).
Ferretti JA; Tran HV; Peterson SJ; Loftin V
Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Jun; 71(1-2):51-63. PubMed ID: 23623653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influences of sample interference and interference controls on quantification of enterococci fecal indicator bacteria in surface water samples by the qPCR method.
Haugland RA; Siefring S; Lavender J; Varma M
Water Res; 2012 Nov; 46(18):5989-6001. PubMed ID: 22981586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distribution of indicator bacteria in Canyon Lake, California.
Davis K; Anderson MA; Yates MV
Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(7):1277-88. PubMed ID: 15862327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA-based real-time detection and quantification of aeromonads from fresh water beaches on Lake Ontario.
Khan IU; Loughborough A; Edge TA
J Water Health; 2009 Jun; 7(2):312-23. PubMed ID: 19240357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A critical evaluation of a flow cytometer used for detecting enterococci in recreational waters.
King DN; Brenner KP; Rodgers MR
J Water Health; 2007 Jun; 5(2):295-305. PubMed ID: 17674577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antimicrobial resistance and species composition of Enterococcus spp. isolated from waters and sands of marine recreational beaches in Southeastern Brazil.
de Oliveira AJ; Pinhata JM
Water Res; 2008 Apr; 42(8-9):2242-50. PubMed ID: 18177915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Persistence of nucleic acid markers of health-relevant organisms in seawater microcosms: implications for their use in assessing risk in recreational waters.
Walters SP; Yamahara KM; Boehm AB
Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4929-39. PubMed ID: 19616273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of platform, reference material, and quantification model on enumeration of Enterococcus by quantitative PCR methods.
Cao Y; Sivaganesan M; Kinzelman J; Blackwood AD; Noble RT; Haugland RA; Griffith JF; Weisberg SB
Water Res; 2013 Jan; 47(1):233-41. PubMed ID: 23123048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative real-time PCR detection of oral Enterococcus faecalis in humans.
Sedgley CM; Nagel AC; Shelburne CE; Clewell DB; Appelbe O; Molander A
Arch Oral Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(6):575-83. PubMed ID: 15848151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
