BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15707860)

  • 21. Modality-independent processes in cued motor preparation revealed by cortical potentials.
    Diaconescu AO; Kovacevic N; McIntosh AR
    Neuroimage; 2008 Sep; 42(3):1255-65. PubMed ID: 18625564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attentional switching in the sequential flanker task: age, location, and time course effects.
    Li KZ; Dupuis K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):416-27. PubMed ID: 17869202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Category-specific organization of prefrontal response-facilitation during priming.
    Bunzeck N; Schütze H; Düzel E
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1765-76. PubMed ID: 16701731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An electromyographic investigation of the effect of stimulus-response mapping on choice reaction time.
    Hasbroucq T; Burle B; Akamatsu M; Vidal F; Possamaï CA
    Psychophysiology; 2001 Jan; 38(1):157-62. PubMed ID: 11321617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Obsessive-compulsive tendencies are associated with a focused information processing strategy.
    Soref A; Dar R; Argov G; Meiran N
    Behav Res Ther; 2008 Dec; 46(12):1295-9. PubMed ID: 18945423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anticipated action consequences as a nexus between action and perception: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Nikolaev AR; Ziessler M; Dimova K; van Leeuwen C
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Apr; 78(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 18289769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Locus of response slowing resulting from alternation-based processing interference.
    Dudschig C; Jentzsch I
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):751-8. PubMed ID: 18665862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.
    Philipp AM; Jolicoeur P; Falkenstein M; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17983313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Notebaert W; Vandierendonck A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Nov; 120(3):307-26. PubMed ID: 15993830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the nonautomaticity of visual word processing: electrophysiological evidence that word processing requires central attention.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Cornett L; Goodin Z; Allen PA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):751-73. PubMed ID: 18505335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automatic imitation of intransitive actions.
    Press C; Bird G; Walsh E; Heyes C
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18077067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Locating information-processing deficits of mildly mentally retarded young adults.
    Kirby NH; Nettelbeck T; Western P
    Am J Ment Defic; 1982 Nov; 87(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 7180896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of short and long exposure duration and dual-tasking on a global-local task.
    Andres AJ; Fernandes MA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):247-66. PubMed ID: 16413493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automatic and controlled semantic processing: a masked prime-task effect.
    Valdés B; Catena A; Marí-Beffa P
    Conscious Cogn; 2005 Jun; 14(2):278-95. PubMed ID: 15950882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A choice reaction-time task in the rat: a new model using air-puff stimuli and lever-release responses.
    Kaneko H; Tamura H; Kawashima T; Suzuki SS
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 174(1):151-9. PubMed ID: 16934882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dynamics of choice during estimation of subjective value.
    Robles E; Roberts NA; Sanabria F
    Behav Processes; 2011 May; 87(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 21276839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cognitive requirements for vestibular and ocular motor processing in healthy adults and patients with unilateral vestibular lesions.
    Talkowski ME; Redfern MS; Jennings JR; Furman JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 17(9):1432-41. PubMed ID: 16197696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Distinct mechanisms for planning keypress and reaching responses: a developmental study.
    Adam JJ; Parthoens S; Pratt J
    Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Jun; 25(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 16650495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preparation.
    Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Oct; 129(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 18804193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.