These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15707915)

  • 1. The perception of spatial order at a glance.
    Popple AV; Levi DM
    Vision Res; 2005 Apr; 45(9):1085-90. PubMed ID: 15707915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Object representations maintain attentional control settings across space and time.
    Schreij D; Olivers CN
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 19682674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing of multisensory spatial congruency can be dissociated from working memory and visuo-spatial attention.
    Zimmer U; Macaluso E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 26(6):1681-91. PubMed ID: 17880400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retinotopic sensitisation to spatial scale: evidence for flexible spatial frequency processing in scene perception.
    Ozgen E; Payne HE; Sowden PT; Schyns PG
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):1108-19. PubMed ID: 16146638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rehearsal strategies can enlarge or diminish the spacing effect: pure versus mixed lists and encoding strategy.
    Delaney PF; Verkoeijen PP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1148-61. PubMed ID: 19686011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial attention can modulate audiovisual integration at multiple cortical and subcortical sites.
    Fairhall SL; Macaluso E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 29(6):1247-57. PubMed ID: 19302160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Receptive field size-dependent attention effects in simultaneously presented stimulus displays.
    Bles M; Schwarzbach J; De Weerd P; Goebel R; Jansma BM
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(2):506-11. PubMed ID: 16256374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emotional salience changes the focus of spatial attention.
    Pauli WM; Röder B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1214():94-104. PubMed ID: 18466885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: the role of visual memory.
    Narasimhan S; Tripathy SP; Barrett BT
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(1):10-27. PubMed ID: 18930074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual and spatial working memory are not that dissociated after all: a time-based resource-sharing account.
    Vergauwe E; Barrouillet P; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1012-28. PubMed ID: 19586267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamics of emotional effects on spatial attention in the human visual cortex.
    Pourtois G; Vuilleumier P
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 156():67-91. PubMed ID: 17015075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cooperation between the hippocampus and the entorhinal cortex in spatial memory: a disconnection study.
    Parron C; Poucet B; Save E
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 170(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 16540184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic modulation of visual detection by auditory cues in spatial neglect.
    Golay L; Hauert CA; Greber C; Schnider A; Ptak R
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1258-65. PubMed ID: 15949510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objects are highlighted by spatial attention.
    Martínez A; Teder-Sälejärvi W; Vazquez M; Molholm S; Foxe JJ; Javitt DC; Di Russo F; Worden MS; Hillyard SA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):298-310. PubMed ID: 16494688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-resolution ERP mapping of cortical activation related to implicit object-location memory.
    Murphy JS; Wynne CE; O'Rourke EM; Commins S; Roche RA
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):234-45. PubMed ID: 19683556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Kanizsa subjective figures capture visual spatial attention: evidence from electrophysiological and behavioral data.
    Senkowski D; Röttger S; Grimm S; Foxe JJ; Herrmann CS
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):872-86. PubMed ID: 15716159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts.
    De Goede M; Postma A
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 17950509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.