These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15707918)

  • 21. Effects of task-irrelevant texture motion on time-to-contact judgments.
    Oberfeld D; Hecht H; Landwehr K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):581-96. PubMed ID: 21264724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attention-based motion perception and motion adaptation: what does attention contribute?
    Verstraten FA; Ashida H
    Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(10):1313-9. PubMed ID: 15733963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neural strength of visual attention gauged by motion adaptation.
    Alais D; Blake R
    Nat Neurosci; 1999 Nov; 2(11):1015-8. PubMed ID: 10526342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perception of motion in depth from luminous rotating spirals: directional asymmetries during and after rotation.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    Perception; 1994; 23(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 7845768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Static motion aftereffect does not modulate positional representations in early visual areas.
    Rajimehr R
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Jul; 20(2):323-7. PubMed ID: 15183403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion is object-based.
    VanRullen R
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(24):4091-5. PubMed ID: 17005233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Components of motion perception revealed: two different after-effects from a single moving object.
    López-Moliner J; Smeets JB; Brenner E
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(22):2545-9. PubMed ID: 15358069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Feature-based attention influences contextual interactions during motion repulsion.
    Tzvetanov T; Womelsdorf T; Niebergall R; Treue S
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3651-8. PubMed ID: 16828839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mechanisms of feature- and space-based attention: response modulation and baseline increases.
    McMains SA; Fehd HM; Emmanouil TA; Kastner S
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 98(4):2110-21. PubMed ID: 17671104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion depends on, but is not identical to neuronal adaptation.
    VanRullen R
    Vision Res; 2007 Jul; 47(16):2143-9. PubMed ID: 17559904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Storage for free: a surprising property of a simple gain-control model of motion aftereffects.
    van de Grind WA; van der Smagt MJ; Verstraten FA
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(19):2269-84. PubMed ID: 15208013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attentional modulation of adaptation to two-component transparent motion.
    Lankheet MJ; Verstraten FA
    Vision Res; 1995 May; 35(10):1401-12. PubMed ID: 7645269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Parallel networks operating across attentional deployment and motion processing: a multi-seed partial least squares fMRI study.
    Caplan JB; Luks TL; Simpson GV; Glaholt M; McIntosh AR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Feb; 29(4):1192-202. PubMed ID: 16236528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reduction in the motion coherence threshold for the same direction as that perceived during adaptation.
    Hirahara M
    Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(28):4623-33. PubMed ID: 17092532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contextual modulation of the motion aftereffect.
    Falkenberg HK; Bex PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):257-70. PubMed ID: 17469967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A model of encoding and decoding in V1 and MT accounts for motion perception anisotropies in the human visual system.
    Rokem A; Silver MA
    Brain Res; 2009 Nov; 1299():3-16. PubMed ID: 19595992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cross-fixation transfer of motion aftereffects with expansion motion.
    Meng X; Mazzoni P; Qian N
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3681-9. PubMed ID: 16824574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Re-evaluation of local adaptation for motion aftereffect.
    Ashida H; Susami K; Osaka N
    Perception; 1996; 25(9):1065-72. PubMed ID: 8983046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attention to surfaces modulates motion processing in extrastriate area MT.
    Wannig A; Rodríguez V; Freiwald WA
    Neuron; 2007 May; 54(4):639-51. PubMed ID: 17521575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Vernier acuity is normal in migraine, whereas global form and global motion perception are not.
    McKendrick AM; Badcock DR; Gurgone M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 47(7):3213-9. PubMed ID: 16799069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.