These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15707928)

  • 1. Attentional effects on contrast discrimination in humans: evidence for both contrast gain and response gain.
    Huang L; Dobkins KR
    Vision Res; 2005 Apr; 45(9):1201-12. PubMed ID: 15707928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preserved gain control for luminance contrast during binocular rivalry suppression.
    Watanabe K; Paik Y; Blake R
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(26):3065-71. PubMed ID: 15474579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of flankers on contrast detection and discrimination in binocular, monocular, and dichoptic presentations.
    Maehara G; Huang PC; Hess RF
    J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):13.1-15. PubMed ID: 20465333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Different attentional resources modulate the gain mechanisms for color and luminance contrast.
    Morrone MC; Denti V; Spinelli D
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1389-401. PubMed ID: 15066398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attention enhances adaptability: evidence from motion adaptation experiments.
    Rezec A; Krekelberg B; Dobkins KR
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(26):3035-44. PubMed ID: 15474576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinguishing lateral interaction from uncertainty reduction in collinear flanker effect on contrast discrimination.
    Wu CC; Chen CC
    J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):8.1-14. PubMed ID: 20377285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention enhances contrast sensitivity at cued and impairs it at uncued locations.
    Pestilli F; Carrasco M
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1867-75. PubMed ID: 15797776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal decisions for contrast discrimination.
    Sanborn AN; Dayan P
    J Vis; 2011 Dec; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 22159630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inverse modeling of human contrast response.
    Katkov M; Tsodyks M; Sagi D
    Vision Res; 2007 Oct; 47(22):2855-67. PubMed ID: 17869321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of fixation points on contrast detection and discrimination of patches of grating: masking and facilitation.
    Summers RJ; Meese TS
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1894-900. PubMed ID: 19426749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast discrimination deficits in retinitis pigmentosa are greater for stimuli that favor the magnocellular pathway.
    Alexander KR; Pokorny J; Smith VC; Fishman GA; Barnes CS
    Vision Res; 2001 Mar; 41(5):671-83. PubMed ID: 11226510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast masking in strabismic amblyopia: attenuation, noise, interocular suppression and binocular summation.
    Baker DH; Meese TS; Hess RF
    Vision Res; 2008 Jul; 48(15):1625-40. PubMed ID: 18547600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does a Bayesian model of V1 contrast coding offer a neurophysiological account of human contrast discrimination?
    Chirimuuta M; Tolhurst DJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(23):2943-59. PubMed ID: 16081128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Background changes delay the perceptual availability of form information.
    Huang X; Blau S; Paradiso MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Dec; 94(6):4331-43. PubMed ID: 16107521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychophysical analysis of contrast processing segregated into magnocellular and parvocellular systems in asymptomatic carriers of 11778 Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy.
    Gualtieri M; Bandeira M; Hamer RD; Costa MF; Oliveira AG; Moura AL; Sadun F; De Negri AM; Berezovsky A; Salomão SR; Carelli V; Sadun AA; Ventura DF
    Vis Neurosci; 2008; 25(3):469-74. PubMed ID: 18598420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discriminating depth in corrugated stereo surfaces: facilitation by a pedestal is explained by removal of uncertainty.
    Georgeson MA; Yates TA; Schofield AJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2321-8. PubMed ID: 18682260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lateral modulation of contrast discrimination: flanker orientation effects.
    Chen CC; Tyler CW
    J Vis; 2002; 2(6):520-30. PubMed ID: 12678649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Covert attention increases contrast sensitivity: Psychophysical, neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies.
    Carrasco M
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 154():33-70. PubMed ID: 17010702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defining the detection mechanisms for symmetric and rectified flicker stimuli.
    Zele AJ; Vingrys AJ
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(21):2700-13. PubMed ID: 17825346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.