These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15709324)

  • 1. Driving and side task performance: the effects of display clutter, separation, and modality.
    Horrey WJ; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):611-24. PubMed ID: 15709324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of navigation display clutter on performance and attention allocation in presentation- and simulator-based driving experiments.
    Pankok C; Kaber D
    Appl Ergon; 2018 May; 69():136-145. PubMed ID: 29477321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An integrated measure of display clutter based on feature content, user knowledge and attention allocation factors.
    Pankok C; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 2018 May; 61(5):682-696. PubMed ID: 29099336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance.
    Liu YC; Jhuang JW
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22103964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Driving While Interacting With Google Glass: Investigating the Combined Effect of Head-Up Display and Hands-Free Input on Driving Safety and Multitask Performance.
    Tippey KG; Sivaraj E; Ferris TK
    Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):671-688. PubMed ID: 28186420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.
    Haque MM; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():42-53. PubMed ID: 24129320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance.
    Horberry T; Anderson J; Regan MA; Triggs TJ; Brown J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jan; 38(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 16226211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing.
    Wang Y; Mehler B; Reimer B; Lammers V; D'Ambrosio LA; Coughlin JF
    Ergonomics; 2010 Mar; 53(3):404-20. PubMed ID: 20191415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Head-up displays: effects of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance.
    Ververs PM; Wickens CD
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1998; 8(4):377-403. PubMed ID: 11542276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of practice with MP3 players on driving performance.
    Chisholm SL; Caird JK; Lockhart J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):704-13. PubMed ID: 18329424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Head up versus head down: the costs of imprecision, unreliability, and visual clutter on cue effectiveness for display signaling.
    Yeh M; Merlo JL; Wickens CD; Brandenburg DL
    Hum Factors; 2003; 45(3):390-407. PubMed ID: 14702991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of distraction mitigation strategies on driving performance.
    Donmez B; Boyle LN; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):785-804. PubMed ID: 17240725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recovering from interruptions: implications for driver distraction research.
    Monk CA; Boehm-Davis DA; Trafton JG
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):650-63. PubMed ID: 15709327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new class of auditory warning signals for complex systems: auditory icons.
    Belz SM; Robinson GS; Casali JG
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):608-18. PubMed ID: 10774131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers' performance in advanced traveller information systems.
    Liu YC
    Ergonomics; 2001 Mar; 44(4):425-42. PubMed ID: 11291824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Secondary Task Engagement on Adolescents' Driving Performance and Crash Risk.
    Klauer SG; Ehsani JP; McGehee DV; Manser M
    J Adolesc Health; 2015 Jul; 57(1 Suppl):S36-43. PubMed ID: 26112736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using Sound to Reduce Visual Distraction from In-vehicle Human-Machine Interfaces.
    Larsson P; Niemand M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S25-30. PubMed ID: 26027972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory displays as occasion setters.
    Mckeown D; Isherwood S; Conway G
    Hum Factors; 2010 Feb; 52(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 20653225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A user study of auditory, head-up and multi-modal displays in vehicles.
    Jakus G; Dicke C; Sodnik J
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Jan; 46 Pt A():184-92. PubMed ID: 25151313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech-based E-mail and driver behavior: effects of an in-vehicle message system interface.
    Jamson AH; Westerman SJ; Hockey GR; Carsten OM
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):625-39. PubMed ID: 15709325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.