These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15709329)

  • 1. Age differences in visual search for traffic signs during a simulated conversation.
    McPhee LC; Scialfa CT; Dennis WM; Ho G; Caird JK
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 15709329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual search for traffic signs: the effects of clutter, luminance, and aging.
    Ho G; Scialfa CT; Caird JK; Graw T
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(2):194-207. PubMed ID: 11592661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conversation disrupts change detection in complex traffic scenes.
    McCarley JS; Vais MJ; Pringle H; Kramer AF; Irwin DE; Strayer DL
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(3):424-36. PubMed ID: 15573543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conversation limits the functional field of view.
    Atchley P; Dressel J
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):664-73. PubMed ID: 15709328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of a concurrent auditory task on visual search performance in a driving-related image-flicker task.
    Richard CM; Wright RD; Ee C; Prime SL; Shimizu Y; Vavrik J
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 12118865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Profiles in driver distraction: effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers.
    Strayer DL; Drews FA
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):640-9. PubMed ID: 15709326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driving and side task performance: the effects of display clutter, separation, and modality.
    Horrey WJ; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):611-24. PubMed ID: 15709324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Useful field of view predicts driving in the presence of distracters.
    Wood JM; Chaparro A; Lacherez P; Hickson L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Apr; 89(4):373-81. PubMed ID: 22366710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blur, eye movements and performance on a driving visual recognition slide test.
    Lee SS; Wood JM; Black AA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):522-9. PubMed ID: 26189873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eye fixation scanpaths of younger and older drivers in a hazard perception task.
    Underwood G; Phelps N; Wright C; van Loon E; Galpin A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):346-56. PubMed ID: 15953120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eye movements of younger and older drivers.
    Maltz M; Shinar D
    Hum Factors; 1999 Mar; 41(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 10354803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age, target-distractor similarity, and visual search.
    Scialfa CT; Esau SP; Joffe KM
    Exp Aging Res; 1998; 24(4):337-58. PubMed ID: 9783154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related differences in visual search task performance: relative stability of parallel but not serial search.
    Oken BS; Kishiyama SS; Kaye JA
    J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol; 1994; 7(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 7916940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regional effects of clutter on human target detection performance.
    Asher MF; Tolhurst DJ; Troscianko T; Gilchrist ID
    J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 23620535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of driving experience on responses to a static hazard perception test.
    Scialfa CT; Borkenhagen D; Lyon J; Deschênes M; Horswill M; Wetton M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():547-53. PubMed ID: 22269541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A yellow filter improves response times to low-contrast targets and traffic hazards.
    Lacherez P; Saeri AK; Wood JM; Atchison DA; Horswill MS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 90(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 23400022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-related differences in the use of background layout in visual search.
    Becic E; Kramer AF; Boot WR
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2007 Mar; 14(2):109-25. PubMed ID: 17364375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Change detection in urban and rural driving scenes: Effects of target type and safety relevance on change blindness.
    Beanland V; Filtness AJ; Jeans R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Mar; 100():111-122. PubMed ID: 28130981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of age and the use of hands-free cellular phones on driving behavior and task performance.
    Liu YC; Ou YK
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):550-8. PubMed ID: 22133330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relation between driving experience and recognition of road signs relative to their locations.
    Borowsky A; Shinar D; Parmet Y
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 18516830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.