These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15709330)

  • 21. The effect of lumbar belts on isolated lumbar muscle. Strength and dynamic capacity.
    Reyna JR; Leggett SH; Kenney K; Holmes B; Mooney V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jan; 20(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 7709282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biomechanically and electromyographically assessed load on the spine in self-paced and force-paced lifting work.
    Leskinen TP; Stålhammar HR; Rautanen MT; Troup JD
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):881-8. PubMed ID: 1633794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Low-back stresses when learning to use a materials handling device.
    Chaffin DB; Stump BS; Nussbaum MA; Baker G
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):94-110. PubMed ID: 9973874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Isometric strength assessment, part I: static testing does not accurately predict dynamic lifting capacity.
    Feeler L; St James JD; Schapmire DW
    Work; 2010; 37(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 20978337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A study of different postures on isometric lifting strength in normal college students.
    Lin JH; Liaw LJ; Chen SM; Lee CH
    Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi; 1995 Dec; 11(12):678-85. PubMed ID: 8551529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relationships between stretch-shortening cycle performance and maximum muscle strength.
    Miyaguchi K; Demura S
    J Strength Cond Res; 2008 Jan; 22(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 18296951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of isokinetic lifting strength with static strength and maximum acceptable weight with special reference to speed of lifting.
    Garg A; Beller D
    Ergonomics; 1994 Aug; 37(8):1363-74. PubMed ID: 7925260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Functional assessment for prediction of lifting capacity.
    Wheeler DL; Graves JE; Miller GJ; O'Connor P; MacMillan M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 May; 19(9):1021-6. PubMed ID: 8029735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Isometric push and pull strengths of young Taiwanese males.
    Chen YL; Lee YC; Hsu TC
    Ind Health; 2011; 49(6):696-702. PubMed ID: 22020013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Combined effects of age and maturation on maximum isometric leg press strength in young basketball players.
    Ioakimidis P; Gerodimos V; Kellis E; Alexandris N; Kellis S
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2004 Dec; 44(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 15758851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Maximum acceptable weights and maximum voluntary isometric strengths for asymmetric lifting.
    Garg A; Badger D
    Ergonomics; 1986 Jul; 29(7):879-92. PubMed ID: 3743543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lumbosacral compression in maximal lifting efforts in sagittal plane with varying mechanical disadvantage in isometric and isokinetic modes.
    Kumar S
    Ergonomics; 1994 Dec; 37(12):1975-83. PubMed ID: 7828579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Isometric and isokinetic back and arm lifting strengths: device and measurement.
    Kumar S; Chaffin DB; Redfern M
    J Biomech; 1988; 21(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 3339025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of angle and level of exertion on trunk neuromuscular performance during multidirectional isometric activities.
    Mousavi SJ; Olyaei GR; Talebian S; Sanjari MA; Parnianpour M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(5):E170-7. PubMed ID: 19247156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Strength training: isometric training at a range of joint angles versus dynamic training.
    Folland JP; Hawker K; Leach B; Little T; Jones DA
    J Sports Sci; 2005 Aug; 23(8):817-24. PubMed ID: 16195033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison between elderly and young males' lumbopelvic extensor muscle endurance assessed during a clinical isometric back extension test.
    Champagne A; Descarreaux M; Lafond D
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009 Sep; 32(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 19748403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Determination of lifting abilities: a comparative study of four techniques.
    Khalil TM; Waly SM; Genaidy AM; Asfour SS
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Dec; 48(12):951-6. PubMed ID: 3434537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workload by Chinese subjects.
    Zhu ZX; Zhang ZJ
    Ergonomics; 1990 Jul; 33(7):875-84. PubMed ID: 2226423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Test-retest reliability of isometric and isoinertial testing in symmetric and asymmetric lifting.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jul; 41(7):1050-9. PubMed ID: 9674377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Design and evaluation of a novel triaxial isometric trunk muscle strength measurement system.
    Azghani MR; Farahmand F; Meghdari A; Vossoughi G; Parnianpour M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Aug; 223(6):755-66. PubMed ID: 19743641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.