168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15709499)
1. The efficiency of three different films and radiovisiography in detecting approximal carious lesions.
Erten H; Akarslan ZZ; Topuz O
Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 15709499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Approximal carious lesion depth assessment with insight and ultraspeed films.
Güngör K; Erten H; Akarslan ZZ; Celik I; Semiz M
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 15765958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ
Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P
Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of direct digital and conventional imaging with Ekta Speed Plus and INSIGHT films for the detection of approximal caries.
de Araujo EA; Castilho JC; Medici Filho E; de Moraes ME
Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 16296430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis.
Nair MK; Nair UP
Caries Res; 2001; 35(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 11641571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
Hintze H; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries.
Castro VM; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of a new F-speed film for caries detection.
Ludlow JB; Abreu M; Mol A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 11313732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of computer-automated caries detection in digital radiographs compared with human observers.
Wenzel A; Hintze H; Kold LM; Kold S
Eur J Oral Sci; 2002 Jun; 110(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 12120704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
Haak R; Wicht MJ; Nowak G; Hellmich M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiographic detection of cavitation in approximal surfaces of primary teeth using a digital storage phosphor system and conventional film, and the relationship between cavitation and radiographic lesion depth: an in vitro study.
Nielsen LL; Hoernoe M; Wenzel A
Int J Paediatr Dent; 1996 Sep; 6(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 9115972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems.
Syriopoulos K; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 10980568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Approximal caries diagnosis after data import from different digital radiography systems: interobserver agreement and comparison to histological hard-tissue sections.
Schulte AG; Wittchen A; Stachniss V; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P
Caries Res; 2008; 42(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 18063865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
