43 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15709538)
1. Improving performance of content-based image retrieval schemes in searching for similar breast mass regions: an assessment.
Wang XH; Park SC; Zheng B
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):949-61. PubMed ID: 19147902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptive learning for relevance feedback: application to digital mammography.
Oh JH; Yang Y; El Naqa I
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4432-44. PubMed ID: 20879602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial neural networks in mammography interpretation and diagnostic decision making.
Ayer T; Chen Q; Burnside ES
Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():832509. PubMed ID: 23781276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incorrect support and missing center tolerances of phasing algorithms.
Huang X; Nelson J; Steinbrener J; Kirz J; Turner JJ; Jacobsen C
Opt Express; 2010 Dec; 18(25):26441-9. PubMed ID: 21164994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AI Improves Cancer Detection and Reading Time of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Bae MS
Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e240219. PubMed ID: 38747570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Implementation of AI in Screening Mammography: The Essential Role of Prospective Evaluation.
Lee AY; Friedewald SM
Radiology; 2024 Jun; 311(3):e241124. PubMed ID: 38832882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved sensitivity and specificity of mammograms by producing uniform luminance from viewboxes.
Waynant RW; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmerak R; Suleiman O; Rowberg A
J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):189-91. PubMed ID: 9735466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Noninvasive radiomics signature based on quantitative analysis of computed tomography images as a surrogate for microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot study.
Bakr S; Echegaray S; Shah R; Kamaya A; Louie J; Napel S; Kothary N; Gevaert O
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2017 Oct; 4(4):041303. PubMed ID: 28840174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterizing Architectural Distortion in Mammograms by Linear Saliency.
Narváez F; Alvarez J; Garcia-Arteaga JD; Tarquino J; Romero E
J Med Syst; 2017 Feb; 41(2):26. PubMed ID: 28005248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Core samples for radiomics features that are insensitive to tumor segmentation: method and pilot study using CT images of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Echegaray S; Gevaert O; Shah R; Kamaya A; Louie J; Kothary N; Napel S
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2015 Oct; 2(4):041011. PubMed ID: 26587549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms of interval cancer.
Rangayyan RM; Banik S; Desautels JE
J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):611-31. PubMed ID: 20127270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of the optic nerve head in fundus images of the retina with Gabor filters and phase portrait analysis.
Rangayyan RM; Zhu X; Ayres FJ; Ells AL
J Digit Imaging; 2010 Aug; 23(4):438-53. PubMed ID: 20066466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gabor filters and phase portraits for the detection of architectural distortion in mammograms.
Rangayyan RM; Ayres FJ
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 Oct; 44(10):883-94. PubMed ID: 16991010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of architectural distortion in mammograms.
Ayres FJ; Rangayyan RM
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2005; 24(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 15709538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
Singh S; Bovis K
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of breast tissue classification techniques.
Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí R; Zwiggelaar R
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):872-9. PubMed ID: 17354855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
