43 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15709538)
21. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
Singh S; Bovis K
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Detecting microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet domain hidden Markov tree model.
Regentova E; Zhang L; Zheng J; Veni G
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1972-5. PubMed ID: 17945686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images.
Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí J; Pérez E; Pont J; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
Med Image Anal; 2010 Apr; 14(2):87-110. PubMed ID: 20071209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review.
Elter M; Horsch A
Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2052-68. PubMed ID: 19610294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. CAD for mammography: the technique, results, current role and further developments.
Malich A; Fischer DR; Böttcher J
Eur Radiol; 2006 Jul; 16(7):1449-60. PubMed ID: 16416275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Registration and difference analysis of corresponding mammogram images.
Sallam MY; Bowyer KW
Med Image Anal; 1999 Jun; 3(2):103-18. PubMed ID: 10711993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Automated delineation of radiotherapy volumes: are we going in the right direction?
Whitfield GA; Price P; Price GJ; Moore CJ
Br J Radiol; 2013 Jan; 86(1021):20110718. PubMed ID: 23239689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Digital mammography.
Maidment AD
Semin Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 38(3):216-30. PubMed ID: 14513726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Phase contrast imaging of the breast. Basic principles and steps towards clinical implementation].
Grandl S; Sztrókay-Gaul A; Auweter SD; Hellerhoff K
Radiologe; 2014 Mar; 54(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 24623010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fair shares: building and benefiting from healthcare AI with mutually beneficial structures and development partnerships.
Sidebottom R; Lyburn I; Brady M; Vinnicombe S
Br J Cancer; 2021 Oct; 125(9):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 34262148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Role of Artificial Intelligence in Imaging: From A Radiologist's Point of View with A Focus on Breast Imaging.
Çelik L
Anatol J Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 22(Suppl 2):13-14. PubMed ID: 31670714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Characterization of architectural distortion in mammograms.
Ayres FJ; Rangayyan RM
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2005; 24(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 15709538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of breast tissue classification techniques.
Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí R; Zwiggelaar R
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):872-9. PubMed ID: 17354855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
