394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15710137)
1. The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses.
Sohaib SA; Mills TD; Sahdev A; Webb JA; Vantrappen PO; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
Clin Radiol; 2005 Mar; 60(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 15710137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Classification of asymptomatic adnexal masses by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography.
Grab D; Flock F; Stöhr I; Nüssle K; Rieber A; Fenchel S; Brambs HJ; Reske SN; Kreienberg R
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Jun; 77(3):454-9. PubMed ID: 10831359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance evaluation of adnexal masses.
Guerra A; Cunha TM; Félix A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):700-9. PubMed ID: 18568564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complex US adnexal masses during pregnancy: Is pelvic MR imaging accurate for characterization?
Thomassin-Naggara I; Fedida B; Sadowski E; Chevrier MC; Chabbert-Buffet N; Ballester M; Tavolaro S; Darai E
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():200-208. PubMed ID: 28668416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of adnexal masses: combination of color Doppler and conventional sonography compared with spectral Doppler analysis alone and conventional sonography alone.
Buy JN; Ghossain MA; Hugol D; Hassen K; Sciot C; Truc JB; Poitout P; Vadrot D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 8553953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
Salem S; White LM; Lai J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection and characterization of adnexal masses.
Funt SA; Hann LE
Radiol Clin North Am; 2002 May; 40(3):591-608. PubMed ID: 12117195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Asymptomatic adnexal masses: correlation of FDG PET and histopathologic findings.
Fenchel S; Grab D; Nuessle K; Kotzerke J; Rieber A; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ; Reske SN
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):780-8. PubMed ID: 12034950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiological reasoning: imaging characterization of bilateral adnexal masses.
Lee SI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3 Suppl):S460-6. PubMed ID: 16928898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging.
Sohaib SA; Sahdev A; Van Trappen P; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 May; 180(5):1297-304. PubMed ID: 12704041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adnexal masses: transvaginal US and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging assessment of intratumoral structure.
Komatsu T; Konishi I; Mandai M; Togashi K; Kawakami S; Konishi J; Mori T
Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 8539360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Difficulties in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses during pregnancy: the role of greyscale and color doppler sonography].
Czekierdowski A; Bednarek W; Rogowska W; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2001 Dec; 72(12A):1281-6. PubMed ID: 11883264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; López-García G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 17(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 11380970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving risk stratification of indeterminate adnexal masses on MRI: What imaging features help predict malignancy in O-RADS MRI 4 lesions?
Wong BZY; Causa Andrieu PI; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Aviki EM; Vargas HA; Woo S
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 168():111122. PubMed ID: 37806193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical evaluation of the specificity of MRI and TVUS for differentiation of malignant from benign adnexal lesions.
Reuter M; Steffens J; Schüppler U; Lüttges J; Muhle C; Brinkmann G; Maschek A; Weisner D; Spielmann R; Heller M
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9442126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Multiparametric MRI (mMRI) on the Therapeutic Management of Adnexal Masses Detected with Transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS): An Interdisciplinary Management Approach.
Dirrichs T; Bauerschlag D; Maass N; Kuhl CK; Schrading S
Acad Radiol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):183-197. PubMed ID: 33293256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adnexal masses: accuracy of detection and differentiation with multidetector computed tomography.
Tsili AC; Tsampoulas C; Charisiadi A; Kalef-Ezra J; Dousias V; Paraskevaidis E; Efremidis SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18486202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
