95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15710537)
1. Improving 3D PET imaging by restoration: a phantom study.
Knesaurek K; Machac J
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2005 Jan; 29(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 15710537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional imaging in whole body oncologic PET/CT: a Discovery-STE phantom and patient study.
Bettinardi V; Mancosu P; Danna M; Giovacchini G; Landoni C; Picchio M; Gilardi MC; Savi A; Castiglioni I; Lecchi M; Fazio F
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Sep; 51(3):214-23. PubMed ID: 17464266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. NEMA NU4-2008 image quality performance report for the microPET focus 120 and for various transmission and reconstruction methods.
Bahri MA; Plenevaux A; Warnock G; Luxen A; Seret A
J Nucl Med; 2009 Oct; 50(10):1730-8. PubMed ID: 19759103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigation of 18F-FDG 3D mode PET image quality versus acquisition time.
Brown C; Dempsey MF; Gillen G; Elliott AT
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Mar; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 20032801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. NEMA NU 2-2001 performance measurements of an LYSO-based PET/CT system in 2D and 3D acquisition modes.
Kemp BJ; Kim C; Williams JJ; Ganin A; Lowe VJ;
J Nucl Med; 2006 Dec; 47(12):1960-7. PubMed ID: 17138738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance characteristics of a new 3-dimensional continuous-emission and spiral-transmission high-sensitivity and high-resolution PET camera evaluated with the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard.
Matsumoto K; Kitamura K; Mizuta T; Tanaka K; Yamamoto S; Sakamoto S; Nakamoto Y; Amano M; Murase K; Senda M
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 16391191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of activity outside the field of view on image quality for a 3D LSO-based whole body PET/CT scanner.
Matheoud R; Secco C; Della Monica P; Leva L; Sacchetti G; Inglese E; Brambilla M
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(19):5861-72. PubMed ID: 19759405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance characteristics of a newly developed PET/CT scanner using NEMA standards in 2D and 3D modes.
Mawlawi O; Podoloff DA; Kohlmyer S; Williams JJ; Stearns CW; Culp RF; Macapinlac H;
J Nucl Med; 2004 Oct; 45(10):1734-42. PubMed ID: 15471842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative PET comparing gated with nongated acquisitions using a NEMA phantom with respiratory-simulated motion.
Vines DC; Keller H; Hoisak JD; Breen SL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 18006594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An analytical scatter correction for singles-mode transmission data in PET.
Vandervoort E; Sossi V
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Mar; 27(3):402-12. PubMed ID: 18334435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using the NEMA NU 4 PET image quality phantom in multipinhole small-animal SPECT.
Harteveld AA; Meeuwis AP; Disselhorst JA; Slump CH; Oyen WJ; Boerman OC; Visser EP
J Nucl Med; 2011 Oct; 52(10):1646-53. PubMed ID: 21849403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity and daily quality control of a mobile PET/CT scanner operating in 3-dimensional mode.
Belakhlef A; Church C; Fraser R; Lakhanpal S
J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):229-31. PubMed ID: 18006593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Reduction of radiation exposure in PET examinations by data acquisition in the 3D mode].
Brix G; Adam LE; Zaers J; Trojan H; Bellemann ME; Nosske D; Doll J
Nuklearmedizin; 1999 Apr; 38(3):75-9. PubMed ID: 10320992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the presence of truncation artifacts.
Beyer T; Bockisch A; Kühl H; Martinez MJ
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 16391192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of different techniques for stereotactic positron emission tomography imaging.
Novotny J; Nechvil K; Ptacek J; Novotny J; Liscak R
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2008; 86(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 17881886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PET imaging problems with the non-standard positron emitters Yttrium-86 and Iodine-124.
Herzog H; Tellmann L; Scholten B; Coenen HH; Qaim SM
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Jun; 52(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 18043538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Objective and subjective comparison of standard 2-D and fully 3-D reconstructed data on a PET/CT system.
Strobel K; Rüdy M; Treyer V; Veit-Haibach P; Burger C; Hany TF
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Jul; 28(7):555-9. PubMed ID: 17538397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correction methods for random coincidences in fully 3D whole-body PET: impact on data and image quality.
Brasse D; Kinahan PE; Lartizien C; Comtat C; Casey M; Michel C
J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):859-67. PubMed ID: 15872361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image-quality assessment for several positron emitters using the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards in the Siemens Inveon small-animal PET scanner.
Disselhorst JA; Brom M; Laverman P; Slump CH; Boerman OC; Oyen WJ; Gotthardt M; Visser EP
J Nucl Med; 2010 Apr; 51(4):610-7. PubMed ID: 20237025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of contamination from scattered photons in singles-mode transmission data on quantitative small-animal PET imaging.
Vandervoort E; Sossi V
J Nucl Med; 2008 Nov; 49(11):1852-61. PubMed ID: 18927322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
