These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15711800)

  • 1. Evaluation of DNA mixtures involving two pairs of relatives.
    Hu YQ; Fung WK
    Int J Legal Med; 2005 Sep; 119(5):251-9. PubMed ID: 15711800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpreting DNA mixtures with the presence of relatives.
    Hu YQ; Fung WK
    Int J Legal Med; 2003 Feb; 117(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 12592594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating mixed stains with contributors of different ethnic groups under the NRC-II Recommendation 4.1.
    Fung WK; Hu YQ
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(23):3583-93. PubMed ID: 12436457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
    Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DNA profiling: evaluation of the evidentiary value.
    Bär W
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2003 Mar; 5 Suppl 1():S41-4. PubMed ID: 12935550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpretation of complex forensic DNA mixtures.
    Ladd C; Lee HC; Yang N; Bieber FR
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 11387631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contributors are a nuisance (parameter) for DNA mixture evidence evaluation.
    Slooten K; Caliebe A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():116-125. PubMed ID: 30145539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accurate assessment of the weight of evidence for DNA mixtures by integrating the likelihood ratio.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():1-16. PubMed ID: 27914277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixtures with relatives and linked markers.
    Dørum G; Kling D; Tillmar A; Vigeland MD; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):621-34. PubMed ID: 26614310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Casework applications of probabilistic genotyping methods for DNA mixtures that allow relationships between contributors.
    Green PJ; Mortera J; Prieto L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102482. PubMed ID: 33640736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Likelihood ratios for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) typing in criminal cases.
    Jarjoura D; Jamison J; Androulakakis S
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 Jan; 39(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 8113714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The analogy between DNA kinship and DNA mixture evaluation, with applications for the interpretation of likelihood ratios produced by possibly imperfect models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102449. PubMed ID: 33517022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The predictive value of the maximum likelihood estimator of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture.
    Haned H; Pène L; Sauvage F; Pontier D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 20488773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the number of contributors to forensic DNA mixtures: does maximum likelihood perform better than maximum allele count?
    Haned H; Pène L; Lobry JR; Dufour AB; Pontier D
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20840286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpreting DNA mixtures.
    Weir BS; Triggs CM; Starling L; Stowell LI; Walsh KA; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 1997 Mar; 42(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 9068179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating forensic DNA mixtures with contributors of different structured ethnic origins: a computer software.
    Hu YQ; Fung WK
    Int J Legal Med; 2003 Aug; 117(4):248-9. PubMed ID: 12827379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Investigation into Compound Likelihood Ratios for Forensic DNA Mixtures.
    Wivell R; Kelly H; Kokoszka J; Daniels J; Dickson L; Buckleton J; Bright JA
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of likelihood ratios with and without assuming relatedness for DNA mixtures interpreted using a continuous model.
    Kruijver M; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jan; 62():102800. PubMed ID: 36372011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.